From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751494AbdAYJYC (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 25 Jan 2017 04:24:02 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:33225 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751363AbdAYJYA (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 25 Jan 2017 04:24:00 -0500
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:23:55 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, tglx@linutronix.de,
        peterz@infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] usb: dbc: early driver for xhci debug capability
Message-ID: <20170125092355.GA24580@gmail.com>
References: <1479189731-2728-1-git-send-email-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <1479189731-2728-2-git-send-email-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
 <20170119093743.GC22865@gmail.com>
 <58817A25.6080305@linux.intel.com>
 <20170122090423.GA15061@gmail.com>
 <5886DBB7.4070501@linux.intel.com>
 <20170124082039.GB8667@gmail.com>
 <5888377F.8090709@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5888377F.8090709@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> > Hiding essentially an early udelay() implementation in an early-printk driver is 
> > ugly and counterproductive.
> 
> Sure. How about below change?
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/early/xhci-dbc.c b/drivers/usb/early/xhci-dbc.c
> index d3f0c84..940989e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/early/xhci-dbc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/early/xhci-dbc.c
> @@ -587,6 +587,35 @@ static int xdbc_bulk_transfer(void *data, int size, bool read)
>         return size;
>  }
>  
> +static void __init xdbc_udelay_calibration(void)
> +{
> +       unsigned long lpj = 0;
> +       unsigned int tsc_khz, cpu_khz;
> +
> +       if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC))
> +               goto calibration_out;
> +
> +       cpu_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_cpu();
> +       tsc_khz = x86_platform.calibrate_tsc();
> +
> +       if (tsc_khz == 0)
> +               tsc_khz = cpu_khz;
> +       else if (abs(cpu_khz - tsc_khz) * 10 > tsc_khz)
> +               cpu_khz = tsc_khz;
> +
> +       if (!tsc_khz)
> +               goto calibration_out;
> +
> +       lpj = tsc_khz * 1000;
> +       do_div(lpj, HZ);
> +
> +calibration_out:
> +       if (!lpj)
> +               lpj = 1 << 22;
> +
> +       loops_per_jiffy = lpj;
> +}
> +
>  static int __init xdbc_early_setup(void)
>  {
>         int ret;
> @@ -686,6 +715,8 @@ int __init early_xdbc_parse_parameter(char *s)
>         }
>         xdbc.xdbc_reg = (struct xdbc_regs __iomem *)(xdbc.xhci_base + offset);
>  
> +       xdbc_udelay_calibration();
> +
>         return 0;
>  }

Yeah - so could we do this in a more generic fashion, not in the early-printk 
driver but in core x86 code?

Thanks,

	Ingo