From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: split scsi passthrough fields out of struct request V2 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:34:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20170127163450.GA17311@lst.de> References: <1485365126-23210-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20170127161114.GA501@kernel.dk> <20170127161718.GA16911@lst.de> <775aff8d-6bcc-9cc5-cfa3-dd1c157c95c5@fb.com> <20170127162316.GA17059@lst.de> <195e1638-7d85-0618-0101-5cfff34b91e9@fb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <195e1638-7d85-0618-0101-5cfff34b91e9@fb.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Mike Snitzer , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Junichi Nomura , Christoph Hellwig List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:27:02AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > Feel free to repost it, I have no problem rebasing that branch as it's > standalone for now. Ok, I'll repost what I have right now, which is on top of a merge of your block/for-4.11/next and your for-next from this morning my time. Btw, I disagred with your patch to use op_is_flush in generic_make_request_checks - given that we clear these flags just below I think using the helper obsfucates what's really going on. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:34:50 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Mike Snitzer , Junichi Nomura , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: split scsi passthrough fields out of struct request V2 Message-ID: <20170127163450.GA17311@lst.de> References: <1485365126-23210-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20170127161114.GA501@kernel.dk> <20170127161718.GA16911@lst.de> <775aff8d-6bcc-9cc5-cfa3-dd1c157c95c5@fb.com> <20170127162316.GA17059@lst.de> <195e1638-7d85-0618-0101-5cfff34b91e9@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <195e1638-7d85-0618-0101-5cfff34b91e9@fb.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:27:02AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > Feel free to repost it, I have no problem rebasing that branch as it's > standalone for now. Ok, I'll repost what I have right now, which is on top of a merge of your block/for-4.11/next and your for-next from this morning my time. Btw, I disagred with your patch to use op_is_flush in generic_make_request_checks - given that we clear these flags just below I think using the helper obsfucates what's really going on.