From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753515AbdA3NlD (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:41:03 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:44910 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753391AbdA3Nk4 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:40:56 -0500
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:40:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        David Windsor <dave@progbits.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] kref: Implement using refcount_t
Message-ID: <20170130134033.GK6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20161114173946.501528675@infradead.org>
 <20161114174446.832175072@infradead.org>
 <CAGXu5jKHZ3O5fy7iBSr3=wci7Np0FCTFtAEFKE=NQWCG1bQ7Og@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170127095801.GG6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAGXu5jLjeKN8ybVUv52CHNORHrRofE1u1viSSkm8SpEZbTvE-Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jLjeKN8ybVUv52CHNORHrRofE1u1viSSkm8SpEZbTvE-Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:07:35PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > Nothing much, except lack of time. I spend the last several days hunting
> > bugs, that trumps new features on my todo list.
> 
> Totally understood. I was just trying to see if there was anything I
> could help with for it. Are you expecting it to change much from your
> original posted version?

There's a few things I wanted to play with, but I suppose we can merge
as is and fix up later. I should hopefully get time to do so this week.