All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>, Yves Dionne <yves.dionne@gmail.com>,
	Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/CPU/AMD: Bring back Compute Unit ID
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 16:43:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170202154359.fevz4fmwc6t4ew75@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170202121054.im3c3iiqp26a2dyb@pd.tnic>

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 01:10:54PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Now on to run the same thing on a bigger bulldozer.

It looks differently on the bigger box:

before:

 Performance counter stats for 'make -s -j17 bzImage' (3 runs):

    1333240.579196      task-clock (msec)         #    9.271 CPUs utilized            ( +-  0.03% )
           393,521      context-switches          #    0.295 K/sec                    ( +-  0.27% )
     6,629,632,543      cache-misses                                                  ( +-  0.10% )
            51,570      cpu-migrations            #    0.039 K/sec                    ( +-  1.21% )
        27,812,379      page-faults               #    0.021 M/sec                    ( +-  0.05% )
 3,633,456,270,448      cycles                    #    2.725 GHz                      ( +-  0.03% )
 2,144,192,888,087      instructions              #    0.59  insn per cycle                                              ( +-  0.00% )
   476,225,081,234      branches                  #  357.194 M/sec                    ( +-  0.00% )
    25,294,199,758      branch-misses             #    5.31% of all branches          ( +-  0.02% )

     143.807894000 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.89% )


after:

 Performance counter stats for 'make -s -j17 bzImage' (3 runs):

    1330842.218684      task-clock (msec)         #    9.047 CPUs utilized            ( +-  0.14% )
           396,044      context-switches          #    0.298 K/sec                    ( +-  0.60% )
     6,625,112,597      cache-misses                                                  ( +-  0.36% )
            60,050      cpu-migrations            #    0.045 K/sec                    ( +-  1.11% )
        27,862,451      page-faults               #    0.021 M/sec                    ( +-  0.08% )
 3,625,822,644,429      cycles                    #    2.724 GHz                      ( +-  0.12% )
 2,144,932,865,362      instructions              #    0.59  insn per cycle                                              ( +-  0.01% )
   476,375,898,692      branches                  #  357.951 M/sec                    ( +-  0.01% )
    25,226,837,830      branch-misses             #    5.30% of all branches          ( +-  0.09% )

     147.109189694 seconds time elapsed                                          ( +-  0.49% )

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-02 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-01 20:02 [RFC PATCH] x86/CPU/AMD: Bring back Compute Unit ID Borislav Petkov
2017-02-01 21:37 ` Ghannam, Yazen
2017-02-01 21:44   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-01 21:55     ` Ghannam, Yazen
2017-02-01 22:25       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-01 22:41         ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-02 12:10           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-02 15:43             ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2017-02-02 16:09               ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-02 17:04                 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-02 18:10                   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-02 20:45                     ` Ghannam, Yazen
2017-02-02 16:14             ` Ghannam, Yazen
2017-02-02 16:29               ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170202154359.fevz4fmwc6t4ew75@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
    --cc=Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yves.dionne@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.