From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753270AbdBJP5r (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:57:47 -0500 Received: from mail-ot0-f194.google.com ([74.125.82.194]:36662 "EHLO mail-ot0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752513AbdBJP5m (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:57:42 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:46:14 -0500 From: Tejun Heo To: Paul Turner Cc: lizefan@huawei.com, Johannes Weiner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , Mike Galbraith , cgroups , LKML , kernel-team , lvenanci@redhat.com, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCHSET for-4.11] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread mode Message-ID: <20170210154614.GB16097@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <20170202200632.13992-1-tj@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:07:16AM -0800, Paul Turner wrote: > What are the motivations that you see for forcing this all onto one > mount-point via .threads sub-tree tags? So, you wanted rgroup but with /proc interface? I'm afraid it's too late for that. Thanks. -- tejun From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCHSET for-4.11] cgroup: implement cgroup v2 thread mode Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:46:14 -0500 Message-ID: <20170210154614.GB16097@mtj.duckdns.org> References: <20170202200632.13992-1-tj@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=EjzILj/vvuU8OFK2WQQ8S6rVzXNrrt3WhnaEyBniVHI=; b=UIJXPhHIoxUvtLDI01Gn8AdO7wG5h9YdP5hKbOTL5/LpFBhWBFo8MN8Li95qa/mVTf 4nNcg22EV7CvJ1tSgOB1n2V6sRnzFjSNSjHI4OkgPioRAXx2Py0fnDi5OXNHs9Mk1B8f +M/bpEhu2BPYv8+NZM8h3oFQp7l9Qna2+DCNqYu2ChAsJzbjCS99GM7UazUm8eBFrEhl YjpkRCqUFvutlpdTGAJtLetU2Q2+00/9ZXDxV5VhNyD8IvdryHh5ahK2+GeCp3PXHuuz VHFRkkPpIMbG0xmG/Jtj8H7sjzeOqH5FkazwoJ0Kj0whSP6IK+8EmVTjpetnHmPoD2In o9Yw== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Paul Turner Cc: lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Johannes Weiner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , Mike Galbraith , cgroups , LKML , kernel-team , lvenanci-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:07:16AM -0800, Paul Turner wrote: > What are the motivations that you see for forcing this all onto one > mount-point via .threads sub-tree tags? So, you wanted rgroup but with /proc interface? I'm afraid it's too late for that. Thanks. -- tejun