From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 21:02:24 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] Analysis of build results for 2017-02-13 In-Reply-To: <20170214163927.GA3624@free.fr> References: <20170214072856.3AE8320B8C@mail.free-electrons.com> <20170214142725.1b9e98ae@free-electrons.com> <20170214163927.GA3624@free.fr> Message-ID: <20170214210224.7fb5c2a8@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:39:27 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > On 2017-02-14 14:27 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > > > arm | mesa3d-demos-8.3.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/6f197c643972e92f0b27b3afac7da7b4b1115f7e > > > > BR2_PACKAGE_PROVIDES_LIBGL="mesa3d" > > BR2_PACKAGE_PROVIDES_LIBEGL="rpi-userland" > > BR2_PACKAGE_PROVIDES_LIBGLES="rpi-userland" > > > > This seems like a quite messy configuration: we have mesa3d as the > > OpenGL provider, and rpi-userland as the OpenGLES/EGL provider. Yann, > > what do you think about this? > > I believe this case does not make sense. We should protect against that. Indeed. The question is how :-) Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com