From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933963AbdBQNQH (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:16:07 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34024 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933915AbdBQNQG (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:16:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 07:16:02 -0600 From: Josh Poimboeuf To: Jiri Slaby Cc: mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PREVIEW 10/10] linkage: add .cfi_{start/end}proc to ENTRY/ENDPROC Message-ID: <20170217131602.pxrgfaeaanrzymnv@treble> References: <20170217104757.28588-1-jslaby@suse.cz> <20170217104757.28588-10-jslaby@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170217104757.28588-10-jslaby@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0.1 (2016-04-01) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:47:57AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > This is just a preview, not to merged now, only later with DWARF > unwinder series. This is what the series will serve for (aside from > cleanup and unification). > > I am aware of CFI_STARTPROC and CFI_ENDPROC left defined in other archs > in spite of cfi annotations removal ages ago. For simplicity. I am using > DW_ prefix here. If objtool is going to be generating CFI instructions, why not have it generate .cfi_startproc and .cfi_endproc too? -- Josh