All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, open-iscsi@googlegroups.com,
	lduncan@suse.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] libiscsi: add lock around task lists to fix list corruption regression
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 09:35:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170221173536.32024-1-cleech@redhat.com> (raw)

There's a rather long standing regression from commit
659743b [SCSI] libiscsi: Reduce locking contention in fast path

Depending on iSCSI target behavior, it's possible to hit the case in
iscsi_complete_task where the task is still on a pending list
(!list_empty(&task->running)).  When that happens the task is removed
from the list while holding the session back_lock, but other task list
modification occur under the frwd_lock.  That leads to linked list
corruption and eventually a panicked system.

Rather than back out the session lock split entirely, in order to try
and keep some of the performance gains this patch adds another lock to
maintain the task lists integrity.

Major enterprise supported kernels have been backing out the lock split
for while now, thanks to the efforts at IBM where a lab setup has the
most reliable reproducer I've seen on this issue.  This patch has been
tested there successfully.

Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/scsi/libiscsi.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
index 834d121..acb5ef3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
@@ -560,8 +560,12 @@ static void iscsi_complete_task(struct iscsi_task *task, int state)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(task->state == ISCSI_TASK_FREE);
 	task->state = state;
 
-	if (!list_empty(&task->running))
+	spin_lock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
+	if (!list_empty(&task->running)) {
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "iscsi_complete_task while task on list");
 		list_del_init(&task->running);
+	}
+	spin_unlock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 
 	if (conn->task == task)
 		conn->task = NULL;
@@ -783,7 +787,9 @@ __iscsi_conn_send_pdu(struct iscsi_conn *conn, struct iscsi_hdr *hdr,
 		if (session->tt->xmit_task(task))
 			goto free_task;
 	} else {
+		spin_lock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 		list_add_tail(&task->running, &conn->mgmtqueue);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 		iscsi_conn_queue_work(conn);
 	}
 
@@ -1474,8 +1480,10 @@ void iscsi_requeue_task(struct iscsi_task *task)
 	 * this may be on the requeue list already if the xmit_task callout
 	 * is handling the r2ts while we are adding new ones
 	 */
+	spin_lock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 	if (list_empty(&task->running))
 		list_add_tail(&task->running, &conn->requeue);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 	iscsi_conn_queue_work(conn);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iscsi_requeue_task);
@@ -1512,22 +1520,26 @@ static int iscsi_data_xmit(struct iscsi_conn *conn)
 	 * only have one nop-out as a ping from us and targets should not
 	 * overflow us with nop-ins
 	 */
+	spin_lock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 check_mgmt:
 	while (!list_empty(&conn->mgmtqueue)) {
 		conn->task = list_entry(conn->mgmtqueue.next,
 					 struct iscsi_task, running);
 		list_del_init(&conn->task->running);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 		if (iscsi_prep_mgmt_task(conn, conn->task)) {
 			/* regular RX path uses back_lock */
 			spin_lock_bh(&conn->session->back_lock);
 			__iscsi_put_task(conn->task);
 			spin_unlock_bh(&conn->session->back_lock);
 			conn->task = NULL;
+			spin_lock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 			continue;
 		}
 		rc = iscsi_xmit_task(conn);
 		if (rc)
 			goto done;
+		spin_lock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 	}
 
 	/* process pending command queue */
@@ -1535,19 +1547,24 @@ static int iscsi_data_xmit(struct iscsi_conn *conn)
 		conn->task = list_entry(conn->cmdqueue.next, struct iscsi_task,
 					running);
 		list_del_init(&conn->task->running);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 		if (conn->session->state == ISCSI_STATE_LOGGING_OUT) {
 			fail_scsi_task(conn->task, DID_IMM_RETRY);
+			spin_lock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 			continue;
 		}
 		rc = iscsi_prep_scsi_cmd_pdu(conn->task);
 		if (rc) {
 			if (rc == -ENOMEM || rc == -EACCES) {
+				spin_lock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 				list_add_tail(&conn->task->running,
 					      &conn->cmdqueue);
 				conn->task = NULL;
+				spin_unlock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 				goto done;
 			} else
 				fail_scsi_task(conn->task, DID_ABORT);
+			spin_lock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 			continue;
 		}
 		rc = iscsi_xmit_task(conn);
@@ -1558,6 +1575,7 @@ static int iscsi_data_xmit(struct iscsi_conn *conn)
 		 * we need to check the mgmt queue for nops that need to
 		 * be sent to aviod starvation
 		 */
+		spin_lock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 		if (!list_empty(&conn->mgmtqueue))
 			goto check_mgmt;
 	}
@@ -1577,12 +1595,15 @@ static int iscsi_data_xmit(struct iscsi_conn *conn)
 		conn->task = task;
 		list_del_init(&conn->task->running);
 		conn->task->state = ISCSI_TASK_RUNNING;
+		spin_unlock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 		rc = iscsi_xmit_task(conn);
 		if (rc)
 			goto done;
+		spin_lock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 		if (!list_empty(&conn->mgmtqueue))
 			goto check_mgmt;
 	}
+	spin_unlock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&conn->session->frwd_lock);
 	return -ENODATA;
 
@@ -1738,7 +1759,9 @@ int iscsi_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *sc)
 			goto prepd_reject;
 		}
 	} else {
+		spin_lock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 		list_add_tail(&task->running, &conn->cmdqueue);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 		iscsi_conn_queue_work(conn);
 	}
 
@@ -2896,6 +2919,7 @@ iscsi_conn_setup(struct iscsi_cls_session *cls_session, int dd_size,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn->mgmtqueue);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn->cmdqueue);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn->requeue);
+	spin_lock_init(&conn->taskqueuelock);
 	INIT_WORK(&conn->xmitwork, iscsi_xmitworker);
 
 	/* allocate login_task used for the login/text sequences */
diff --git a/include/scsi/libiscsi.h b/include/scsi/libiscsi.h
index b0e275d..583875e 100644
--- a/include/scsi/libiscsi.h
+++ b/include/scsi/libiscsi.h
@@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ struct iscsi_conn {
 	struct iscsi_task	*task;		/* xmit task in progress */
 
 	/* xmit */
+	spinlock_t		taskqueuelock;  /* protects the next three lists */
 	struct list_head	mgmtqueue;	/* mgmt (control) xmit queue */
 	struct list_head	cmdqueue;	/* data-path cmd queue */
 	struct list_head	requeue;	/* tasks needing another run */
-- 
2.9.3

             reply	other threads:[~2017-02-21 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-21 17:35 Chris Leech [this message]
     [not found] ` <20170221173536.32024-1-cleech-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-23 22:11   ` [PATCH] libiscsi: add lock around task lists to fix list corruption regression Martin K. Petersen
2017-02-23 22:25   ` Chris Leech
2017-02-24 15:09     ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
     [not found]       ` <4304a9c0-6427-c0a2-e18a-51292d62022b-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-24 19:48         ` Ilkka Sovanto
     [not found]     ` <250619225.63072551.1487888748696.JavaMail.zimbra-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-05 20:49       ` Ilkka Sovanto
     [not found]         ` <CAKYn0tiyWNEjFZHaPDHNjam5=3WCR_V2svNiJmvWeYhpv3=8Ag-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-05-09 22:27           ` Ilkka Sovanto
     [not found]             ` <CAKYn0tjF46gxwj3MtjLL_ic+veXjTZ9n_BGKjz6-fW+Cse2w9w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2018-12-18 21:07               ` Alan Adamson
2017-02-28  0:58 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Leech
2017-02-28  0:58   ` Chris Leech
2017-02-28 16:46   ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2017-02-28 16:46     ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2017-03-01  3:06   ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-03-01  3:06     ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170221173536.32024-1-cleech@redhat.com \
    --to=cleech@redhat.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=lduncan@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=open-iscsi@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.