From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751462AbdBWKdL (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 05:33:11 -0500 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]:39372 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750916AbdBWKcq (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 05:32:46 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 11:32:39 +0100 From: Alexandre Belloni To: m18063 Cc: thierry.reding@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: pwm: pwm-atmel: add support to allow run time changing of pwm parameters Message-ID: <20170223103239.tv6nodddlar5l5fl@piout.net> References: <1487839120-13650-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <1487839120-13650-3-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <20170223092148.5qmxy62xkufwbsrw@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/02/2017 at 12:25:58 +0200, m18063 wrote: > > It is probably worth switching to atomic PWM instead of changing this > > function. This would simplify the whole driver. > I was thinking to switch to atomic PWM in a future patch. Then why wait ? -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 11:32:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: pwm: pwm-atmel: add support to allow run time changing of pwm parameters In-Reply-To: References: <1487839120-13650-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <1487839120-13650-3-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <20170223092148.5qmxy62xkufwbsrw@piout.net> Message-ID: <20170223103239.tv6nodddlar5l5fl@piout.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 23/02/2017 at 12:25:58 +0200, m18063 wrote: > > It is probably worth switching to atomic PWM instead of changing this > > function. This would simplify the whole driver. > I was thinking to switch to atomic PWM in a future patch. Then why wait ? -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com