From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751758AbdBWR2R (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:28:17 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:45333 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751191AbdBWR2P (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:28:15 -0500
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 18:28:01 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [BUG] msr-trace.h:42 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
Message-ID: <20170223172801.GH6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20161121005343.GB1891@krava>
 <20161121092850.GF3102@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20170223122434.GA20127@krava>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170223122434.GA20127@krava>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 01:24:34PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:28:50AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > I think I prefer something like the below, that only annotates the one
> > RDMSR in question, instead of all of them.
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > index 0888a879120f..d6c6aa80675f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static void amd_e400_idle(void)
> >  	if (!amd_e400_c1e_detected) {
> >  		u32 lo, hi;
> >  
> > -		rdmsr(MSR_K8_INT_PENDING_MSG, lo, hi);
> > +		RCU_NONIDLE(rdmsr(MSR_K8_INT_PENDING_MSG, lo, hi));
> >  
> >  		if (lo & K8_INTP_C1E_ACTIVE_MASK) {
> >  			amd_e400_c1e_detected = true;
> 
> hum, I might have missed some other solution in discussion,
> and can't see this one being pulled in.. should I resend this?
> 

I think Boris and Thomas were talking about moving the entire c1e
detection out of there.