On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:55:31 +1100 Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > From: Greg Kurz > > Some systems can already provide more than 255 hardware threads. > > Bumping the QEMU limit to 1024 seems reasonable: > - it has no visible overhead in top; > - the limit itself has no effect on hot paths. > > Cc: Greg Kurz > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy > --- > > With ulimit -u/-n bumped (nproc and nofile), I was able to boot a guest > with 1024 CPUs, both with threads=1 and threads=8. > > It takes time though - 3:15 to get to the guest shell but it is probably > expected on 160-threads machine. > I remember something similiar at the time... also I had to give more RAM to the guest to be able to run 1024 CPUs (sth like 6 gigs versus 512 megs for 1 CPU). With the same amount of guest RAM, each extra CPU would cause the memory used by QEMU to grow about 8 megs. > --- > hw/ppc/spapr.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c > index e465d7ac98..46b81a625d 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c > @@ -2712,7 +2712,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) > mc->init = ppc_spapr_init; > mc->reset = ppc_spapr_reset; > mc->block_default_type = IF_SCSI; > - mc->max_cpus = 255; > + mc->max_cpus = 1024; > mc->no_parallel = 1; > mc->default_boot_order = ""; > mc->default_ram_size = 512 * M_BYTE;