All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
	Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@selhorst.net>,
	apronin@google.com, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Apply an adapterlimit for retransmission.
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:12:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170227191245.ecord2i7o6jwec5k@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFqH_536FjjkWiUS_5PyDJHHgy6S8BvBzArAxSAg6H6oa214KA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1302 bytes --]

Hi,

> >> > Rather than trying small and smaller transfers, would it not be better
> >> > to get the i2c core to expose the quirk info about transfer limits?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Sounds a good idea to me, I guess the quirk info can be accessed with
> >>
> >>   tpm_dev.client->adapter->quirks->max_read_len
> >>
> >> so I think we don't need to touch the i2c core. I'll propose a second version of the patch.
> >
> > Hi Enric
> >
> > You should probably ask Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, the i2c
> > subsystem maintainer. He may prefer adding an API call.

Thanks for pointing me to this thread.

I understand it looks tempting to use the quirks struct directly, but I
don't think this is the proper solution. Quirks are complex and and to
determine which one finally applies, you need all the logic encoded in
i2c_check_for_quirks(). Which already gets called on every transfer.

So, my suggestion would be to simply fall back to a sane minimum when
the maximum failed. 32 (I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX) should be a good choice.

BTW I noted that the original patch checks for -EINVAL. The core returns
-EOPNOTSUPP, though. So, a) the patch needs to be adapted and b) it
looks the i2c host driver returning -EINVAL could be converted to use
the quirk infrastructure? Which driver is it?

Regards,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
To: Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
	apronin-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Apply an adapterlimit for retransmission.
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:12:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170227191245.ecord2i7o6jwec5k@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFqH_536FjjkWiUS_5PyDJHHgy6S8BvBzArAxSAg6H6oa214KA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1328 bytes --]

Hi,

> >> > Rather than trying small and smaller transfers, would it not be better
> >> > to get the i2c core to expose the quirk info about transfer limits?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Sounds a good idea to me, I guess the quirk info can be accessed with
> >>
> >>   tpm_dev.client->adapter->quirks->max_read_len
> >>
> >> so I think we don't need to touch the i2c core. I'll propose a second version of the patch.
> >
> > Hi Enric
> >
> > You should probably ask Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>, the i2c
> > subsystem maintainer. He may prefer adding an API call.

Thanks for pointing me to this thread.

I understand it looks tempting to use the quirks struct directly, but I
don't think this is the proper solution. Quirks are complex and and to
determine which one finally applies, you need all the logic encoded in
i2c_check_for_quirks(). Which already gets called on every transfer.

So, my suggestion would be to simply fall back to a sane minimum when
the maximum failed. 32 (I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX) should be a good choice.

BTW I noted that the original patch checks for -EINVAL. The core returns
-EOPNOTSUPP, though. So, a) the patch needs to be adapted and b) it
looks the i2c host driver returning -EINVAL could be converted to use
the quirk infrastructure? Which driver is it?

Regards,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 202 bytes --]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 192 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-27 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-21 14:44 [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Apply an adapterlimit for retransmission Enric Balletbo i Serra
2017-02-21 14:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] tpm: Do not assume an i2c adapter preserves the msg len Enric Balletbo i Serra
2017-02-21 16:29 ` [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tpm: Apply an adapterlimit for retransmission Andrew Lunn
2017-02-22 11:16   ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2017-02-22 14:01     ` Andrew Lunn
2017-02-27 18:48       ` Enric Balletbo Serra
2017-02-27 19:12         ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2017-02-27 19:12           ` Wolfram Sang
2017-02-27 21:30           ` [tpmdd-devel] " Enric Balletbo Serra
2017-02-27 21:30             ` Enric Balletbo Serra
2017-03-02 13:15           ` [tpmdd-devel] " Peter Huewe
2017-03-02 13:15             ` Peter Huewe
2017-03-02 14:05             ` [tpmdd-devel] " Wolfram Sang
2017-03-02 14:10             ` Wolfram Sang
2017-02-22 12:39   ` Peter Huewe
2017-02-22 12:39     ` Peter Huewe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170227191245.ecord2i7o6jwec5k@ninjato \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=apronin@google.com \
    --cc=eballetbo@gmail.com \
    --cc=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tpmdd@selhorst.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.