From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Westphal Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] audit: normalize NETFILTER_PKT Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 13:45:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20170303124526.GC29213@breakpoint.cc> References: <044a666e507a829f8c1d6dcc19ad78cd9f140ddd.1488142060.git.rgb@redhat.com> <20170301162802.GV18258@madcap2.tricolour.ca> <20170301223447.GA18258@madcap2.tricolour.ca> <20170303020007.GF18258@madcap2.tricolour.ca> <20170303115416.GH18258@madcap2.tricolour.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Woerner , linux-audit@redhat.com, Netfilter Developer Mailing List , Thomas Graf To: Richard Guy Briggs Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170303115416.GH18258@madcap2.tricolour.ca> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > Perhaps I'm missing something here, but let me ask again, how does > > userspace distinguish between an unset nfmark and a nfmark of > > 0xffffffff? > > It can't. It can if you log it as 0, as I asked in patch 1 review. (You wouldn't log sk uid of 0 as -1 either, would you?)