1;4601;0c On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 11:35:39AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > The A10s has an HDMI controller connected to the second TCON channel. Add > > it to our DT. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i.dtsi | 1 +- > > 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi > > index 074485782a4a..3482c9d2b120 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi > > @@ -72,7 +72,33 @@ > > }; > > }; > > > > + display-engine { > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a10s-display-engine", > > + "allwinner,sun5i-a13-display-engine"; > > + allwinner,pipelines = <&fe0>; > > + }; > > + > > soc@01c00000 { > > + hdmi0: hdmi@01c16000 { > > Nit: is the 0 suffix needed? I don't see any indication that there is > a second controller. > > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a10s-hdmi"; > > + reg = <0x01c16000 0x1000>; > > + clocks = <&ccu CLK_AHB_HDMI>, <&ccu CLK_HDMI>, > > + <&ccu CLK_PLL_VIDEO0_2X>, > > + <&ccu CLK_PLL_VIDEO1_2X>; > > + clock-names = "ahb", "mod", "pll-0", "pll-1"; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + > > + port { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + > > + hdmi0_in_tcon0: endpoint@0 { > > + reg = <0>; > > + remote-endpoint = <&tcon0_out_hdmi0>; > > + }; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > pwm: pwm@01c20e00 { > > compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a10s-pwm"; > > reg = <0x01c20e00 0xc>; > > @@ -129,3 +155,11 @@ > > > > &sram_a { > > }; > > + > > +&tcon0_out { > > + tcon0_out_hdmi0: endpoint@2 { > > + reg = <2>; > > + remote-endpoint = <&hdmi0_in_tcon0>; > > + allwinner,tcon-channel = <1>; > > + }; > > +}; > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i.dtsi > > index f3b6e19244f9..3d009b2aa42a 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i.dtsi > > @@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ > > tcon0_out_tve0: endpoint@1 { > > reg = <1>; > > remote-endpoint = <&tve0_in_tcon0>; > > + allwinner,tcon-channel = <1>; > > This looks like a separate patch, probably following the binding > change? I don't know, the binding says that without anything specified, reg would be used. I was assuming that we only needed it once we had the new endpoint to make it consistent, therefore it didn't need an extra patch. But I can definitely create one if you want. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com