All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "W. Michael Petullo" <mike@flyn.org>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Modifying NFQUEUE rules in flight
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 21:18:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170314011838.GA9432@imp.flyn.org> (raw)

I have a question about the use of NFQUEUE from userspace.

Imagine two firewall rules:

        (A): NFQUEUE tcp -- imp x.x.x.x tcp dpt:http NFQUEUE num 0

and

        (B): NFQUEUE tcp -- imp x.x.x.x tcp dpt:http NFQUEUE num 1

I am interested in making the callback associated with rule (A)/NFQUEUE 0
remove rule (B) and replace it (usng firewalld/dbus in my case)
with another, more specific rule. For example, perhaps the callback for
NFQUEUE 0 would rewrite rule (B) to include a source port. I am further
interested in having this new rule apply to the packet being processed.

Is this type of modification in flight possible? By the time the callback
for (A)/NFQUEUE 0 is invoked, the kernel is obviously processing a packet
through the rule chain. In my experiments I have not been able to modify
the chain such that the kernel continues to push the packet through the
modified chain.

I assume that if this is possible it requires the proper use of NF_QUEUE,
NF_STOLEN, and so on. However, I have not yet come across a clear
description of the meaning of these values with respect to libnetfilter.

I can instead get what I want by copying some of the functionality in
(B)'s callback to (A)'s callback. However, the two callbacks really do
two different things, and futher (A) exists only for a short time. For
these reasons, I am trying to move the code to something which resembles
what I describe above.

Any comments would be helpful.

Thank you,

-- 
Mike

:wq

             reply	other threads:[~2017-03-14  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-14  1:18 W. Michael Petullo [this message]
2017-03-14  8:08 ` Modifying NFQUEUE rules in flight Eric Leblond

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170314011838.GA9432@imp.flyn.org \
    --to=mike@flyn.org \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.