From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752266AbdCNN00 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:26:26 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56568 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752177AbdCNN0X (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:26:23 -0400
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:24:27 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release
Message-ID: <20170314132427.GA27369@redhat.com>
References: <CACT4Y+bgMfF=jUjNcVSSrBZy0xbyCPeNiDsW-c-S9sHe-Vxc=g@mail.gmail.com> <20170306131459.GC6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170307140414.GA31678@redhat.com> <CACT4Y+bzNOrMHmfP_cv3Jzaqs0zB3qHY9eu0y4JdKvVw0mgveA@mail.gmail.com> <20170307165131.GA6097@redhat.com> <20170314125508.GK3343@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170314125508.GK3343@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:26:23 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 03/14, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:51:32PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > inherit_event() returns NULL under is_orphaned_event() check, not ERR_PTR().
> > Is it correct?
>
> Yes. This is all a tad tricky, but it seems to be correct.
>
> By returning NULL, not an error, we affect the silent discard of
> orphaned events. This is correct, because otherwise
> perf_event_release_kernel() would have come by and explicitly discarded
> those events for us anyway.

Thanks... I'll try to understand this later.

> @@ -10608,7 +10627,6 @@ inherit_task_group(struct perf_event *event, struct task_struct *parent,
>  		 * First allocate and initialize a context for the
>  		 * child.
>  		 */
> -
>  		child_ctx = alloc_perf_context(parent_ctx->pmu, child);
>  		if (!child_ctx)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -10670,7 +10688,7 @@ static int perf_event_init_context(struct task_struct *child, int ctxn)
>  		ret = inherit_task_group(event, parent, parent_ctx,
>  					 child, ctxn, &inherited_all);
>  		if (ret)
> -			break;
> +			goto out_unlock;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -10686,7 +10704,7 @@ static int perf_event_init_context(struct task_struct *child, int ctxn)
>  		ret = inherit_task_group(event, parent, parent_ctx,
>  					 child, ctxn, &inherited_all);
>  		if (ret)
> -			break;
> +			goto out_unlock;

With this change you can also simplify inherit_task_group() a little bit,
it no longer needs to nullify *inherited_all if inherit_group() fails.

Oleg.