All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: perf: use-after-free in perf_release
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:07:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170314150739.GD32474@worktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170314150241.GO5680@worktop>

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 04:02:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:30:11PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 
> > But. perf_event_init_task() adds child_event to parent_event->child_list.
> > 
> > If perf_event_release_kernel(parent_event) is called before copy_process()
> > does perf_event_free_task() which (in particular) removes it from child_list,
> > perf_event_release_kernel() can find this child_event and do get_ctx(ctx)
> > (under the list_for_each_entry(child, &event->child_list, child_list) loop).
> 
> Right; the child_list is the only thing that is exposed. And yes, it
> looks like that can interleave just right.
> 
> > Then it does put_ctx(ctx), but ctx->task can be already freed by
> > copy_process()->free_task() in this case.
> 
> 
> 	Task1				Task2
> 
> 	fork()
> 	  perf_event_init_task()
> 	  /* ... */
> 	  goto bad_fork_$foo;
> 	  /* ... */
> 	  perf_event_free_task()
> 	    mutex_lock(ctx->lock)
> 	    perf_free_event(B)
> 
> 					perf_event_release_kernel(A)
> 					  mutex_lock(A->child_mutex)
> 					  list_for_each_entry(child, ...) {
> 					    /* child == B */
> 					    ctx = B->ctx;
> 					    get_ctx(ctx);
> 					    mutex_unlock(A->child_mutex);
> 
> 	      mutex_lock(A->child_mutex)
> 	      list_del_init(B->child_list)
> 	      mutex_unlock(A->child_mutex)
> 
> 	      /* ... */
> 
> 	    mutex_unlock(ctx->lock);
> 	    put_ctx() /* >0 */
> 	  free_task();
> 					    mutex_lock(ctx->lock);
> 					    mutex_lock(A->child_mutex);
> 					    /* ... */
> 					    mutex_unlock(A->child_mutex);
> 					    mutex_unlock(ctx->lock)
> 					    put_ctx() /* 0 */
> 					      ctx->task && !TOMBSTONE
> 					        put_task_struct() /* UAF */
> 
> 
> Something like that, right?
> 
> 
> Let me see if it makes sense to retain perf_event_free_task() at all;
> maybe we should always do perf_event_exit_task().

Do we want a WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&tsk->usage)); in free_task()?
Because in the above scenario we're freeing it with references on.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-14 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-06  9:57 perf: use-after-free in perf_release Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 12:17   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 12:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 12:27       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-06 12:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 13:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-06 13:34   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-07  9:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-07  9:26       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-07  9:37         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-07  9:43           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-07 10:00             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-07 13:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-07 13:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-07 14:04   ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-07 14:17     ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-07 16:51       ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-07 17:29         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 12:55         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 13:24           ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-14 13:47             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 14:03           ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-14 14:07             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 14:30               ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-14 15:02                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 15:07                   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-03-14 15:37                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-14 15:46                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 15:19                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-14 15:26                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-14 15:59                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-15 16:43                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-16 12:05                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 13:57                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 16:41                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-03-16 12:47 [PATCH 0/4] perf patches Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 12:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf: Fix use-after-free in perf_release() Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 15:19   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/core: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 12:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf: Fix event inheritance on fork() Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 15:19   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/core: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 12:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf: Simplify perf_event_free_task() Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 15:20   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/core: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 12:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf: Better explain the inherit magic Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 15:21   ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/core: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 13:20 ` [PATCH 0/4] perf patches Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170314150739.GD32474@worktop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.