From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: me@tobin.cc (Tobin C. Harding) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:40:17 +1100 Subject: pr_debug In-Reply-To: References: <20170315083136.GA18728@eros> <20170315104044.GA29639@eros> <87y3w6eqtr.fsf@miraculix.mork.no> <20170315211524.GB4721@eros> Message-ID: <20170316124017.GB24260@eros> To: kernelnewbies@lists.kernelnewbies.org List-Id: kernelnewbies.lists.kernelnewbies.org On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:17:42PM +0200, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:12:48PM +0100, Bj?rn Mork wrote: > >> Alexander Kapshuk writes: > >> > >> >>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > >> >>> > why does calling pr_debug() with more than one argument cause a sparse > >> >>> > warning? > >> >>> > > >> >>> > drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c:70:9: error: unknown field name in initializer > >> >>> > > >> >>> > sdio_io.c:70: > >> >>> > pr_debug("SDIO: Enabling device %s...\n", sdio_func_id(func)); > >> .. > >> > 'sdio_func_id()' is a macro defined here: > >> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/include/linux/mmc/sdio_func.h?id=refs/tags/v4.11-rc2 > >> > #define sdio_func_id(f) (dev_name(&(f)->dev)) > >> > >> > >> So the "func" in that debug call contains a 'struct device'. Any > >> reason why the pr_debug() shouldn't be converted to something like > >> > >> dev_dbg(&func->dev, "SDIO: Enabling device...\n"); > > > > Good point Bj?rn, thanks. And thank you Alexander for your input. I > > fear I may have sent you both on a wild goose chase with the example > > that I chose. pr_debug() causes a sparse warning in many instances > > when the format string includes format specifiers. > > > > /* this is fine */ > > pr_debug("some info string"); > > > > /* this often causes Sparse warning */ > > pr_debug("string with specifier: %d", foo); > > > > A simple example can be seen by adding this function > > > > void foo(const char *baz) > > { > > pr_debug("cause Sparse warning - %s\n", baz); > > } > > > > To a random driver, and running `make C=2 M=drivers/staging/ks7010` > > > > drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c:2702:9: error: unknown field name in initializer > > > > For more examples from the kernel tree, running: > > $ make -j9 C=2 M=drivers/staging 2>sparse.out > > > > gives many such cases, for example: > > > > drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c:472:17: error: unknown field name in initialize > > drivers/staging/media/bcm2048/radio-bcm2048.c:2596:17: error: unknown field name in initializer > > drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_tty.c:1274:17: error: unknown field name in initializer > > > > Also dev_debug causes the same sparse warning at times, for example: > > > > drivers/staging/comedi/comedi_fops.c:352:17: error: unknown field name in initialize > > > > if (s->busy) { > > dev_dbg(dev->class_dev, > > "subdevice is busy, cannot resize buffer\n"); > > return -EBUSY; > > } > > > > And 2 more example instances of dev_debug: > > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/das16.c:578:25: error: unknown field name in initialize > > drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_tty.c:1274:17: error: unknown field name in initializer > > > > thanks, > > Tobin. > > The pr_debug() manpage, https://www.kernel.org/doc/local/pr_debug.txt, > states that: > > Some files call pr_debug(), which is ordinarily an empty macro that discards > its arguments at compile time. To enable debugging output, build the > appropriate file with -DDEBUG by adding > > CFLAGS_[filename].o := -DDEBUG > > to the makefile. > > You did not mention whether you have compiling those modules with the > DEBUG flag enabled, so, perhaps if you didn't, that could be the > reason why you've been getting those errors. Nice suggestion, thanks. I have DEBUG enabled. thanks, Tobin.