All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [patch 3/7] x86/pci/ce4100: Properly lock accessor functions
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 22:50:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170316215057.126873574@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20170316215002.726697858@linutronix.de

[-- Attachment #1: x86-pci-ce4100--Properly-lock-accessor-functions.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4970 bytes --]

x86 wants to get rid of the global pci_lock protecting the config space
accessors so ECAM mode can operate completely lockless, but the CE4100 pci
code relies on that to protect the simulation registers.

Restructure the code so it uses the x86 specific pci_config_lock to
serialize the inner workings of the CE4100 PCI magic. That allows to remove
the global locking via pci_lock later.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/pci/ce4100.c |   87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/pci/ce4100.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/ce4100.c
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ struct sim_reg_op {
 { PCI_DEVFN(device, func), offset, init_op, read_op, write_op,\
 	{0, SIZE_TO_MASK(size)} },
 
+/*
+ * All read/write functions are called with pci_config_lock held.
+ */
 static void reg_init(struct sim_dev_reg *reg)
 {
 	pci_direct_conf1.read(0, 1, reg->dev_func, reg->reg, 4,
@@ -73,21 +76,13 @@ static void reg_init(struct sim_dev_reg
 
 static void reg_read(struct sim_dev_reg *reg, u32 *value)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_config_lock, flags);
 	*value = reg->sim_reg.value;
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_config_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void reg_write(struct sim_dev_reg *reg, u32 value)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_config_lock, flags);
 	reg->sim_reg.value = (value & reg->sim_reg.mask) |
 		(reg->sim_reg.value & ~reg->sim_reg.mask);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_config_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void sata_reg_init(struct sim_dev_reg *reg)
@@ -117,12 +112,8 @@ static void sata_revid_read(struct sim_d
 
 static void reg_noirq_read(struct sim_dev_reg *reg, u32 *value)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_config_lock, flags);
 	/* force interrupt pin value to 0 */
 	*value = reg->sim_reg.value & 0xfff00ff;
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_config_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static struct sim_dev_reg bus1_fixups[] = {
@@ -265,24 +256,33 @@ int bridge_read(unsigned int devfn, int
 	return retval;
 }
 
-static int ce4100_conf_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
-			    unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value)
+static int ce4100_bus1_read(unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int i;
 
-	WARN_ON(seg);
-	if (bus == 1) {
-		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bus1_fixups); i++) {
-			if (bus1_fixups[i].dev_func == devfn &&
-			    bus1_fixups[i].reg == (reg & ~3) &&
-			    bus1_fixups[i].read) {
-				bus1_fixups[i].read(&(bus1_fixups[i]),
-						    value);
-				extract_bytes(value, reg, len);
-				return 0;
-			}
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bus1_fixups); i++) {
+		if (bus1_fixups[i].dev_func == devfn &&
+		    bus1_fixups[i].reg == (reg & ~3) &&
+		    bus1_fixups[i].read) {
+
+			raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_config_lock, flags);
+			bus1_fixups[i].read(&(bus1_fixups[i]), value);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_config_lock, flags);
+			extract_bytes(value, reg, len);
+			return 0;
 		}
 	}
+	return -1;
+}
+
+static int ce4100_conf_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
+			    unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value)
+{
+	WARN_ON(seg);
+
+	if (bus == 1 && !ce4100_bus1_read(devfn, reg, len, value))
+		return 0;
 
 	if (bus == 0 && (PCI_DEVFN(1, 0) == devfn) &&
 	    !bridge_read(devfn, reg, len, value))
@@ -291,23 +291,32 @@ static int ce4100_conf_read(unsigned int
 	return pci_direct_conf1.read(seg, bus, devfn, reg, len, value);
 }
 
-static int ce4100_conf_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
-			     unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 value)
+static int ce4100_bus1_write(unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 value)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int i;
 
-	WARN_ON(seg);
-	if (bus == 1) {
-		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bus1_fixups); i++) {
-			if (bus1_fixups[i].dev_func == devfn &&
-			    bus1_fixups[i].reg == (reg & ~3) &&
-			    bus1_fixups[i].write) {
-				bus1_fixups[i].write(&(bus1_fixups[i]),
-						     value);
-				return 0;
-			}
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bus1_fixups); i++) {
+		if (bus1_fixups[i].dev_func == devfn &&
+		    bus1_fixups[i].reg == (reg & ~3) &&
+		    bus1_fixups[i].write) {
+
+			raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pci_config_lock, flags);
+			bus1_fixups[i].write(&(bus1_fixups[i]), value);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pci_config_lock, flags);
+			return 0;
 		}
 	}
+	return -1;
+}
+
+static int ce4100_conf_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus,
+			     unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 value)
+{
+	WARN_ON(seg);
+
+	if (bus == 1 && !ce4100_bus1_write(devfn, reg, len, value))
+		return 0;
 
 	/* Discard writes to A/V bridge BAR. */
 	if (bus == 0 && PCI_DEVFN(1, 0) == devfn &&
@@ -318,8 +327,8 @@ static int ce4100_conf_write(unsigned in
 }
 
 static const struct pci_raw_ops ce4100_pci_conf = {
-	.read =	ce4100_conf_read,
-	.write = ce4100_conf_write,
+	.read	= ce4100_conf_read,
+	.write	= ce4100_conf_write,
 };
 
 int __init ce4100_pci_init(void)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-16 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-16 21:50 [patch 0/7] x86/pci: Switch to lockless ECAM configuration mode Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-16 21:50 ` [patch 1/7] x86/pci: Remove duplicate defines Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-27 20:57   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-06-28 20:43   ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/PCI: " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-16 21:50 ` [patch 2/7] x86/pci: Abort if legacy init fails Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-27 20:59   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-06-28 20:44   ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/PCI: " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-16 21:50 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-03-17  0:28   ` [patch 3/7] x86/pci/ce4100: Properly lock accessor functions Andi Kleen
2017-06-27 21:00   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-06-28 20:44   ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/PCI/ce4100: " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-16 21:50 ` [patch 4/7] PCI: Provide Kconfig option for lockless config space accessors Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-27 21:11   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-06-28 20:31     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-28 20:45   ` [tip:x86/platform] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-16 21:50 ` [patch 5/7] x86/pci: Select CONFIG_PCI_LOCKLESS_CONFIG Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-28 20:45   ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/PCI: " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-16 21:50 ` [patch 6/7] x86/pci/mmcfg: Include 32/64 bit code into shared code Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-17  0:25   ` Andi Kleen
2017-03-17  8:41     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-16 21:50 ` [patch 7/7] x86/pci/mmcfg: Switch to ECAM config mode if possible Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-17  0:26   ` Andi Kleen
2017-03-17  6:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-27 21:31       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-06-28 20:46   ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/PCI/mmcfg: " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-29  6:45   ` tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-29 23:26     ` Yinghai Lu
2017-06-30  3:18       ` Andi Kleen
2017-06-30 14:30         ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-30 17:16           ` Linus Torvalds
2017-06-30 18:30             ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2017-06-30 18:46             ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-13  0:25 ` [patch 0/7] x86/pci: Switch to lockless ECAM configuration mode Andi Kleen
2017-06-21 22:28   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-27 20:55     ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170316215057.126873574@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.