From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7A32095B for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751023AbdCQLYG (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:24:06 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:45819 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750898AbdCQLYG (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:24:06 -0400 Received: (qmail 22146 invoked by uid 109); 17 Mar 2017 11:22:32 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 11:22:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 15417 invoked by uid 111); 17 Mar 2017 11:22:44 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:22:44 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:22:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 07:22:29 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Linus Torvalds , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Re-integrate sha1dc Message-ID: <20170317112228.rvqddumn5zairmh3@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20170316220456.m4yz2kbvzv6waokn@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170316221044.ij5yuifmohktn6cl@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170317001416.bthqvjbf554zhrj5@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:22:12PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > My .travis.yml suggestion was about testing with SHA1DC in > preparation for making it the default. That would give us another > incentive to keep an eye on its performance, too, before we make it > the default in Makefile, at which time the forced selection in the > travis configuration can be removed. Yeah, I'm not opposed to that, though it requires somebody actually paying attention to the timings differences. I'm not sure we can do that automatically on Travis. -Peff