From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 20:26:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20170317192642.qnrf7xuopxzapl2r@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20170317001520.85223-1-md@google.com> <20170317001520.85223-7-md@google.com> <20170317120837.pr74cv3xuj7qpoin@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170317180350.63jjysejk2i6vkon@pd.tnic> <20170317185720.5s7qa6hl233t24ag@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Borislav Petkov , Alexander Potapenko , Michael Davidson , Michal Marek , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Shaohua Li , Matthias Kaehlcke , "x86@kernel.org" , "open list:KERNEL BUILD + fi..." , LKML , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@01.org, Fengguang Wu To: Dmitry Vyukov Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:05:16PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > You can also find some reasons in the Why section of LLVM-Linux project: > http://llvm.linuxfoundation.org/index.php/Main_Page >>From that: - LLVM/Clang is a fast moving project with many things fixed quickly and features added. So what's the deal with that 5 year old bug you want us to work around? Also, clang doesn't support asm cc flags output and a few other extensions last time I checked. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] md/raid10, LLVM: get rid of variable length array Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 20:26:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20170317192642.qnrf7xuopxzapl2r@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20170317001520.85223-1-md@google.com> <20170317001520.85223-7-md@google.com> <20170317120837.pr74cv3xuj7qpoin@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20170317180350.63jjysejk2i6vkon@pd.tnic> <20170317185720.5s7qa6hl233t24ag@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Borislav Petkov , Alexander Potapenko , Michael Davidson , Michal Marek , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Shaohua Li , Matthias Kaehlcke , "x86@kernel.org" , "open list:KERNEL BUILD + fi..." , LKML , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@01.org, Fengguang Wu List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:05:16PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > You can also find some reasons in the Why section of LLVM-Linux project: > http://llvm.linuxfoundation.org/index.php/Main_Page >From that: - LLVM/Clang is a fast moving project with many things fixed quickly and features added. So what's the deal with that 5 year old bug you want us to work around? Also, clang doesn't support asm cc flags output and a few other extensions last time I checked.