From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from s2.neomailbox.net (s2.neomailbox.net [5.148.176.60]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A6573043 for ; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 17:17:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 13:17:04 -0400 From: Daniel Dickinson To: akuster808 Message-ID: <20170318131514.2d1aab15@danielf.thecshore.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20170317195515.35729bb7@danielf.thecshore.com> <3a6a7bd6-a5e5-b139-bc2a-53d3b6b41da5@mlbassoc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Gary Thomas , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Hints on submitting to OE-Core X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 17:17:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 01:42:06 -0700 akuster808 wrote: > On 03/17/2017 06:21 PM, Gary Thomas wrote: > > On 2017-03-18 00:55, Daniel Dickinson wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I've got a pre-alpha 'distro' and some layers I think that could > >> get to an interesting state. The intent is to work them up to > >> where they are suitable to be submitted as patches to oe-core > >> rather than the current .bbappend and related files. > >> > >> There's rather a lot of reading (which is good in the sense that I > >> like actually have documentation, although that's definitely an > >> area I need to improve on for the layers I've got in the works), > >> and I haven't nearly got through it all yet, but I was hoping for > >> pointers on the most important bits to read for prepping patches > >> submission. > > > > Have you read this? > > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded > > To be honest, OE-core does not even comply to the basic standard of a > README. It missing patch submission info like many other layers do > nor does in include the Maintainer. > I guess I was so glad of the Yocto manuals that I didn't notice the per-layer bits; that's kind of ironic, and a good place to create some patches for practice, I think! Regards, Daniel