From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:35952 "EHLO mail-wm0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751475AbdCSQUI (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Mar 2017 12:20:08 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id n11so47326129wma.1 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 09:20:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Eugeniu Rosca Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 17:20:04 +0100 To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Eugeniu Rosca , Laurent Pinchart , Linus Walleij , Linux-Renesas Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Print correct pinmux info name Message-ID: <20170319162004.GB8580@x230> References: <20170318205226.GA11403@x230> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 03:02:48PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: Hi Geert, > Thanks for your patch! > But next time, please send it inline, for easier commenting. Thanks! Will do that next time. > From a code maintenance point of view, I think it's safer to update the info > pointer itself, cfr. "[PATCH v2 1/4] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Update info pointer > after SoC-specific init" > (https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-renesas-soc/msg12375.html). Agree! It's good that printing the correct PFC driver name is already fixed on your side. Best regards, Eugeniu.