From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932204AbdCTSGh (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:06:37 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:40952 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756810AbdCTSC1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:02:27 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov , Cong Wang , Eric Dumazet , Gerrit Renker , Thomas Gleixner , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 4.9 19/93] dccp: Unlock sock before calling sk_free() Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:50:54 +0100 Message-Id: <20170320174736.248656199@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.0 In-Reply-To: <20170320174735.243147498@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20170320174735.243147498@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [ Upstream commit d5afb6f9b6bb2c57bd0c05e76e12489dc0d037d9 ] The code where sk_clone() came from created a new socket and locked it, but then, on the error path didn't unlock it. This problem stayed there for a long while, till b0691c8ee7c2 ("net: Unlock sock before calling sk_free()") fixed it, but unfortunately the callers of sk_clone() (now sk_clone_locked()) were not audited and the one in dccp_create_openreq_child() remained. Now in the age of the syskaller fuzzer, this was finally uncovered, as reported by Dmitry: ---- 8< ---- I've got the following report while running syzkaller fuzzer on 86292b33d4b7 ("Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)") [ BUG: held lock freed! ] 4.10.0+ #234 Not tainted ------------------------- syz-executor6/6898 is freeing memory ffff88006286cac0-ffff88006286d3b7, with a lock still held there! (slock-AF_INET6){+.-...}, at: [] spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:299 [inline] (slock-AF_INET6){+.-...}, at: [] sk_clone_lock+0x3d9/0x12c0 net/core/sock.c:1504 5 locks held by syz-executor6/6898: #0: (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.+.}, at: [] lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1460 [inline] #0: (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.+.}, at: [] inet_stream_connect+0x44/0xa0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:681 #1: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [] inet6_csk_xmit+0x12a/0x5d0 net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c:126 #2: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [] __skb_unlink include/linux/skbuff.h:1767 [inline] #2: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [] __skb_dequeue include/linux/skbuff.h:1783 [inline] #2: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [] process_backlog+0x264/0x730 net/core/dev.c:4835 #3: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [] ip6_input_finish+0x0/0x1700 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:59 #4: (slock-AF_INET6){+.-...}, at: [] spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:299 [inline] #4: (slock-AF_INET6){+.-...}, at: [] sk_clone_lock+0x3d9/0x12c0 net/core/sock.c:1504 Fix it just like was done by b0691c8ee7c2 ("net: Unlock sock before calling sk_free()"). Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Cong Wang Cc: Eric Dumazet Cc: Gerrit Renker Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170301153510.GE15145@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/dccp/minisocks.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/net/dccp/minisocks.c +++ b/net/dccp/minisocks.c @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ struct sock *dccp_create_openreq_child(c /* It is still raw copy of parent, so invalidate * destructor and make plain sk_free() */ newsk->sk_destruct = NULL; + bh_unlock_sock(newsk); sk_free(newsk); return NULL; }