From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932812AbdCUOSM (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:18:12 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:55835 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757284AbdCUOSK (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:18:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:08:41 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Jiri Slaby Cc: mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] x86: assembly, FUNC_START for fn, DATA_START for data Message-ID: <20170321140840.GA23311@amd> References: <9ea5e137-61f9-dccc-bb9d-ac3ff86e5867@suse.cz> <20170320123222.15453-1-jslaby@suse.cz> <20170320123222.15453-2-jslaby@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170320123222.15453-2-jslaby@suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > -ENTRY(saved_rbp) .quad 0 > -ENTRY(saved_rsi) .quad 0 > -ENTRY(saved_rdi) .quad 0 > -ENTRY(saved_rbx) .quad 0 > +SYM_DATA_START(saved_rbp) .quad 0 > +SYM_DATA_START(saved_rsi) .quad 0 > +SYM_DATA_START(saved_rdi) .quad 0 > +SYM_DATA_START(saved_rbx) .quad 0 Does it make sense to call it SYM_DATA_*START* when there's no corresponding end? Plus... it looks like saved_rsi (and friends) are only used inside wakeup_64.S. Could we just delete the "ENTRY" annotations? Thanks, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAljRM+gACgkQMOfwapXb+vKgVACdGCXFP24IJi5TzHp3JSy+qrsi zHkAnjG3GFxgL+GH0ngTUOcZyv/nGLH/ =IcHn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] x86: assembly, FUNC_START for fn, DATA_START for data Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:08:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20170321140840.GA23311@amd> References: <9ea5e137-61f9-dccc-bb9d-ac3ff86e5867@suse.cz> <20170320123222.15453-1-jslaby@suse.cz> <20170320123222.15453-2-jslaby@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5168699477915138554==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170320123222.15453-2-jslaby@suse.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Jiri Slaby Cc: Juergen Gross , Len Brown , hpa@zytor.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, tglx@linutronix.de, Boris Ostrovsky List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============5168699477915138554== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > -ENTRY(saved_rbp) .quad 0 > -ENTRY(saved_rsi) .quad 0 > -ENTRY(saved_rdi) .quad 0 > -ENTRY(saved_rbx) .quad 0 > +SYM_DATA_START(saved_rbp) .quad 0 > +SYM_DATA_START(saved_rsi) .quad 0 > +SYM_DATA_START(saved_rdi) .quad 0 > +SYM_DATA_START(saved_rbx) .quad 0 Does it make sense to call it SYM_DATA_*START* when there's no corresponding end? Plus... it looks like saved_rsi (and friends) are only used inside wakeup_64.S. Could we just delete the "ENTRY" annotations? Thanks, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAljRM+gACgkQMOfwapXb+vKgVACdGCXFP24IJi5TzHp3JSy+qrsi zHkAnjG3GFxgL+GH0ngTUOcZyv/nGLH/ =IcHn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ-- --===============5168699477915138554== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLnhlbi5v cmcveGVuLWRldmVsCg== --===============5168699477915138554==--