Hi,

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:47:23PM -0700, Liam Breck wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:52 AM, Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> wrote:
> > That still leaves the health status reading, though. From
> > userspace's point-of-view this should be merged into the
> > battery device, if fuel-gauge can't provide that information.
> 
> You mean merged into the -charger device? -battery is the one
> we're dropping.
> 
> If you did mean -battery, could you elaborate?

I was not talking about bq24190-battery. I meant the battery
device provided by the fuel-gauge. From userspace's point of
view a battery device, which is usually derived from the
fuel-gauge should contain battery related information.

Since the battery health information is battery related it
should somehow be merged into the data from the fuel-gauge.
That's what Hans implemented with the function-pointer
construct and what you suggested to implement in this mail:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=149026871313238&w=2

-- Sebastian