From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932236AbdC1Qta (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:49:30 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:51036 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752763AbdC1Qt1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:49:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:49:11 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Charles Keepax , Lee Jones , Marcel Partap , Michael Scott Message-ID: <20170328164911.xwwl3kdy6j2y7hfq@sirena.org.uk> References: <20170322171052.7006-1-tony@atomide.com> <20170322171052.7006-2-tony@atomide.com> <20170327174952.jsfleql654m2h45i@sirena.org.uk> <20170328003648.GS10760@atomide.com> <20170328151849.uvj2ljkbts4cwksq@sirena.org.uk> <20170328154740.GW10760@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="233epqgljhaie6c2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170328154740.GW10760@atomide.com> X-Cookie: No shirt, no shoes, no service. User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161126 (1.7.1) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1f1d:6b5::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] regmap: irq: Fix lost interrupts by introducing handle_reread X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk); Unknown failure Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --233epqgljhaie6c2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 08:47:41AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Mark Brown [170328 08:21]: > > Right, my thinking here is that by pushing into genirq we minimise the > > need even further since it'll also be available to drivers not using > > regmap-irq. > > > like, handle until we get IRQ_NONE? :) > > Well, that's what the per driver emulation does so... yeah. Probably > > with an upper limit on the number of times we do that. > OK let's first see how that would work. I'll send a patch > for that. Thanks. Can you keep me on the CC please? It's something I keep thinking about looking at myself. --233epqgljhaie6c2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAljalAcACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CX+Af7BAFnKCEit4OGgQjoud0mpjEoXb2u9Z4AWz/kSHb3dDiGGI8O2XFRnNRi rIINAqqv7sTNtrsdSmV78dRtM3PfTODys1tnrufXNVHBWfy3up9iqM68Cx15xte/ 7JGjhtWdk2yZlW2Nq8IGurmh8TwERkynMLZ9zPgHC0OnlROfyPf2GbR2eAbNtbKP N+f0tghHSksXg3z3885ownmlLhaHYkBv48pAxmJYyVqI6hYvWdJf4kxbkDJl7/wA 7RIwsFGnvTlVhzmI/IwX1X88iNlVS503D556fE++uz+XRrQBWsBBlJGBZCVZcldr 8FHdq67GWiR+2rRub4zKq8bd43RPyQ== =nAgO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --233epqgljhaie6c2--