From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932132AbdC2Klb (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 06:41:31 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60531 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755165AbdC2Kl3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 06:41:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:41:26 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Ilya Dryomov Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , stable@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Jerusalimov , Jeff Layton , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 48/76] libceph: force GFP_NOIO for socket allocations Message-ID: <20170329104126.GF27994@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20170328122559.966310440@linuxfoundation.org> <20170328122601.905696872@linuxfoundation.org> <20170328124312.GE18241@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170328133040.GJ18241@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [CC xfs guys] On Wed 29-03-17 11:21:44, Ilya Dryomov wrote: [...] > This is a set of stack traces from http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19309 > (linked in the changelog): > > Workqueue: ceph-msgr con_work [libceph] > ffff8810871cb018 0000000000000046 0000000000000000 ffff881085d40000 > 0000000000012b00 ffff881025cad428 ffff8810871cbfd8 0000000000012b00 > ffff880102fc1000 ffff881085d40000 ffff8810871cb038 ffff8810871cb148 > Call Trace: > [] schedule+0x29/0x70 > [] schedule_timeout+0x1bd/0x200 > [] ? ttwu_do_wakeup+0x2c/0x120 > [] ? ttwu_do_activate.constprop.135+0x66/0x70 > [] wait_for_completion+0xbf/0x180 > [] ? try_to_wake_up+0x390/0x390 > [] flush_work+0x165/0x250 I suspect this is xlog_cil_push_now -> flush_work(&cil->xc_push_work) right? I kind of got lost where this waits on an IO. > [] ? worker_detach_from_pool+0xd0/0xd0 > [] xlog_cil_force_lsn+0x81/0x200 [xfs] > [] ? __slab_free+0xee/0x234 > [] _xfs_log_force_lsn+0x4d/0x2c0 [xfs] > [] ? lookup_page_cgroup_used+0xe/0x30 > [] ? xfs_reclaim_inode+0xa3/0x330 [xfs] > [] xfs_log_force_lsn+0x3f/0xf0 [xfs] > [] ? xfs_reclaim_inode+0xa3/0x330 [xfs] > [] xfs_iunpin_wait+0xc6/0x1a0 [xfs] > [] ? wake_atomic_t_function+0x40/0x40 > [] xfs_reclaim_inode+0xa3/0x330 [xfs] [...] > [] sock_alloc+0x1e/0x80 > [] __sock_create+0x95/0x220 > [] sock_create_kern+0x24/0x30 > [] con_work+0xef9/0x2050 [libceph] > [] ? rbd_img_request_submit+0x4c/0x60 [rbd] > [] process_one_work+0x159/0x4f0 > [] worker_thread+0x11b/0x530 > [] ? create_worker+0x1d0/0x1d0 > [] kthread+0xc9/0xe0 > [] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x90/0x90 > [] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90 > [] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x90/0x90 > > We are writing out data on ceph_connection X: > > ceph_con_workfn > mutex_lock(&con->mutex) # ceph_connection::mutex > try_write > ceph_tcp_connect > sock_create_kern > GFP_KERNEL allocation > allocator recurses into XFS, more I/O is issued I am not sure this is true actually. XFS tends to do an IO from a separate kworkers rather than the direct reclaim context. > Workqueue: rbd rbd_request_workfn [rbd] > ffff880047a83b38 0000000000000046 ffff881025350c00 ffff8800383fa9e0 > 0000000000012b00 0000000000000000 ffff880047a83fd8 0000000000012b00 > ffff88014b638860 ffff8800383fa9e0 ffff880047a83b38 ffff8810878dc1b8 > Call Trace: > [] schedule+0x29/0x70 > [] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x16/0x20 > [] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xa5/0x110 > [] ? ceph_str_hash+0x26/0x80 [libceph] > [] mutex_lock+0x36/0x4a > [] ceph_con_send+0x4d/0x130 [libceph] > [] __send_queued+0x120/0x150 [libceph] > [] __ceph_osdc_start_request+0x5b/0xd0 [libceph] > [] ceph_osdc_start_request+0x51/0x80 [libceph] > [] rbd_obj_request_submit.isra.27+0x10/0x20 [rbd] > [] rbd_img_obj_request_submit+0x23e/0x500 [rbd] > [] rbd_img_request_submit+0x4c/0x60 [rbd] > [] rbd_request_workfn+0x305/0x410 [rbd] > [] process_one_work+0x159/0x4f0 > [] worker_thread+0x11b/0x530 > [] ? create_worker+0x1d0/0x1d0 > [] kthread+0xc9/0xe0 > [] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x90/0x90 > [] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90 > [] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x90/0x90 > > Here is that I/O. We grab ceph_osd_client::request_mutex, but > ceph_connection::mutex is being held by the worker that recursed into > XFS: > > rbd_queue_workfn > ceph_osdc_start_request > mutex_lock(&osdc->request_mutex); > ceph_con_send > mutex_lock(&con->mutex) # deadlock > > > Workqueue: ceph-msgr con_work [libceph] > ffff88014a89fc08 0000000000000046 ffff88014a89fc18 ffff88013a2d90c0 > 0000000000012b00 0000000000000000 ffff88014a89ffd8 0000000000012b00 > ffff880015a210c0 ffff88013a2d90c0 0000000000000000 ffff882028a84798 > Call Trace: > [] schedule+0x29/0x70 > [] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x16/0x20 > [] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xa5/0x110 > [] mutex_lock+0x36/0x4a > [] alloc_msg+0xcf/0x210 [libceph] > [] con_work+0x1675/0x2050 [libceph] > [] ? ttwu_do_wakeup+0x2c/0x120 > [] ? ttwu_do_activate.constprop.135+0x66/0x70 > [] process_one_work+0x159/0x4f0 > [] worker_thread+0x11b/0x530 > [] ? create_worker+0x1d0/0x1d0 > [] kthread+0xc9/0xe0 > [] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x90/0x90 > [] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90 > [] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x90/0x90 > > Workqueue: ceph-msgr con_work [libceph] > ffff88014c10fc08 0000000000000046 ffff88013a2d9988 ffff88013a2d9920 > 0000000000012b00 0000000000000000 ffff88014c10ffd8 0000000000012b00 > ffffffff81c1b4a0 ffff88013a2d9920 0000000000000000 ffff882028a84798 > Call Trace: > [] schedule+0x29/0x70 > [] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x16/0x20 > [] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xa5/0x110 > [] mutex_lock+0x36/0x4a > [] alloc_msg+0xcf/0x210 [libceph] > [] con_work+0x1675/0x2050 [libceph] > [] ? put_prev_entity+0x3c/0x2e0 > [] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x95/0xd0 > [] process_one_work+0x159/0x4f0 > [] worker_thread+0x11b/0x530 > [] ? create_worker+0x1d0/0x1d0 > [] kthread+0xc9/0xe0 > [] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x90/0x90 > [] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90 > [] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x90/0x90 > > These two are replies on ceph_connections Y and Z, which need > ceph_osd_client::request_mutex to figure out which requests can be > completed: > > alloc_msg > get_reply > mutex_lock(&osdc->request_mutex); > > Eventually everything else blocks on ceph_osd_client::request_mutex, > since it's used for both submitting requests and handling replies. > > This really is a straightforward "using GFP_KERNEL on the writeback > path isn't allowed" case. I'm not sure what made you worried here. I am still not sure there is the dependency there. But if anything and the con->mutex is the lock which is dangerous to recurse back to the FS then please wrap the whole scope which takes the lock with the memalloc_noio_save (or memalloc_nofs_save currently sitting in the mmotm tree, if you can wait until that API gets merged) with a big fat comment explaining why that is needed. Sticking the scope protection down the path is just hard to understand later on. And as already mentioned NOFS/NOIO context are (ab)used way too much without a clear/good reason. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs