From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:33:42 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 14/18] sunxi: Pine64: defconfig: enable SPL FIT support In-Reply-To: <9ab9c695-7234-9b0d-9bae-edf94ceaa382@arm.com> References: <1490661926-18400-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <1490661926-18400-15-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20170329065735.rvfzednn7ydcvjd3@lukather> <9ab9c695-7234-9b0d-9bae-edf94ceaa382@arm.com> Message-ID: <20170329123342.fyw3vgjpqu3mtaqb@lukather> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:17:31PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi, > > On 29/03/17 07:57, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:45:22AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > >> The Pine64 (and all other 64-bit Allwinner boards) need to load an > >> ARM Trusted Firmware image beside the actual U-Boot proper. > >> This can now be easily achieved by using the just extended SPL FIT > >> loading support, so enable it in the Pine64 defconfig. > >> Also add the FIT image as a build target to 64-bit sunxi board to > >> trigger the respective Makefile rules. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > >> --- > >> configs/pine64_plus_defconfig | 6 ++++++ > >> include/configs/sunxi-common.h | 4 ++++ > >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/configs/pine64_plus_defconfig b/configs/pine64_plus_defconfig > >> index 92bda60..8a90579 100644 > >> --- a/configs/pine64_plus_defconfig > >> +++ b/configs/pine64_plus_defconfig > >> @@ -3,9 +3,14 @@ CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI=y > >> CONFIG_MACH_SUN50I=y > >> CONFIG_RESERVE_ALLWINNER_BOOT0_HEADER=y > >> CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="sun50i-a64-pine64-plus" > >> +CONFIG_OF_LIST="sun50i-a64-pine64 sun50i-a64-pine64-plus" > >> # CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_CLEAR_ON_INIT is not set > >> CONFIG_CONSOLE_MUX=y > >> CONFIG_SPL=y > >> +CONFIG_FIT=y > >> +CONFIG_SPL_FIT=y > >> +CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT=y > >> +CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT=y > > > > Again, this doesn't make any sense to enable it in *all* our > > defconfigs. If this is something that should be enabled by default for > > the A64 support, then do so in Kconfig directly. > > Oh sorry, I think I completely misunderstood you last time. > Indeed this makes sense, especially with more defconfigs for A64/H5 > boards coming up. > > I will think about a solution that makes Icenowy happy as well, > something like BOARD_NEEDS_SPL_FIT or so - though a simple "select" > sounds tempting ;-) Throwing a bunch of select to reduce the number of options to enable would definitely be welcome indeed, at least between all the SPL_FIT* options. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com