From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 0DBBBE0094C; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:14:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from lelnx194.ext.ti.com (lelnx194.ext.ti.com [198.47.27.80]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2BAE00901 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:14:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by lelnx194.ext.ti.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id v2TEEkiQ026687 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:14:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1490796886; bh=QRc9GT18TO04yXT5d8V+HX/w0ff3CP/cEa6V/vviHDs=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Kry1J9C/U6+H5r+8HBcAFK1942l6p0t6vSSj/YktSJtvSGKOIyb3KrkodAl72wZtR ud8kfNwkyi1mBSQgTq4JpzBw63viDRfyT/bKRdVI7DsIQaQ0/G4nKPtynP4/rQrcfg Do/nwQU38y/hHCmQ9DqDXVddiYGBGeSzdEu2/gA4= Received: from DFLE72.ent.ti.com (dfle72.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.109]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v2TEEkan015081 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:14:46 -0500 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DFLE72.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.294.0; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:14:46 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v2TEEkao013344; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:14:46 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:14:45 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Dan Murphy Message-ID: <20170329141445.GB11364@edge> References: <1490789015-3886-1-git-send-email-dmurphy@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1490789015-3886-1-git-send-email-dmurphy@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] k2hk-hs-evm: add new machine config X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:14:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 07:03:35AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote: > Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy > --- > conf/machine/k2hk-hs-evm.conf | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 conf/machine/k2hk-hs-evm.conf > > diff --git a/conf/machine/k2hk-hs-evm.conf b/conf/machine/k2hk-hs-evm.conf > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..e0b11eb > --- /dev/null > +++ b/conf/machine/k2hk-hs-evm.conf > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > +#@TYPE: Machine > +#@NAME: Keystone 2 K2HK HS EVM > +#@DESCRIPTION: Machine configuration for the TI Keystone 2 K2HK HS EVM > + > +require conf/machine/k2hk-evm.conf > + > +UBOOT_MACHINE = "k2e_hs_evm_config" Dan, Is k2e used here on purpose because k2hk defconfig is not ready yet? > +UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT = "0x82000000" > +UBOOT_LOADADDRESS = "0x82000000" > +UBOOT_RD_LOADADDRESS = "0x84000000" > +UBOOT_RD_ENTRYPOINT = "0x84000000" > + > +TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG = "${TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG_CAT}/k2hk" > -- > 2.7.3 > > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-ti mailing list > meta-ti@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti