From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctIlp-0003NI-13 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:56:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctIll-00050J-Uh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:56:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22b]:35782) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctIll-0004yw-L7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:56:33 -0400 Received: by mail-wr0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id k6so22302153wre.2 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 20:56:30 +0200 From: Christoffer Dall Message-ID: <20170329185630.GA4908@cbox> References: <20170328201623.GD20211@cbox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] host stalls when qemu-system-aarch64 with kvm and pflash List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Radha Mohan Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:24:15PM -0700, Radha Mohan wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > Hi Radha, > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:58:24PM -0700, Radha Mohan wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I am seeing an issue with qemu-system-aarch64 when using pflash > >> (booting kernel via UEFI bios). > >> > >> Host kernel: 4.11.0-rc3-next-20170323 > >> Qemu version: v2.9.0-rc1 > >> > >> Command used: > >> ./aarch64-softmmu/qemu-system-aarch64 -cpu host -enable-kvm -M > >> virt,gic_version=3 -nographic -smp 1 -m 2048 -drive > >> if=none,id=hd0,file=/root/zesty-server-cloudimg-arm64.img,id=0 -device > >> virtio-blk-device,drive=hd0 -pflash /root/flash0.img -pflash > >> /root/flash1.img > >> > >> > >> As soon as the guest kernel boots the host starts to stall and prints > >> the below messages. And the system never recovers. I can neither > >> poweroff the guest nor the host. So I have resort to external power > >> reset of the host. > >> > >> ================== > >> [ 116.199077] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#25 stuck for 23s! > >> [kworker/25:1:454] > >> [ 116.206901] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc nls_iso8859_1 aes_ce_blk > >> shpchp crypto_simd gpio_keys cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce sha2_ce > >> sha1_ce uio_pdrv_genirq uio autofs4 btrfs raid10 rai > >> d456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor > >> raid6_pq libcrc32c raid1 raid0 multipath linear ast i2c_algo_bit ttm > >> drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_s > >> ys_fops drm nicvf ahci nicpf libahci thunder_bgx thunder_xcv > >> mdio_thunder mdio_cavium > >> > >> [ 116.206995] CPU: 25 PID: 454 Comm: kworker/25:1 Not tainted > >> 4.11.0-rc3-next-20170323 #1 > >> [ 116.206997] Hardware name: www.cavium.com crb-1s/crb-1s, BIOS 0.3 Feb 23 2017 > >> [ 116.207010] Workqueue: events netstamp_clear > >> [ 116.207015] task: ffff801f906b5400 task.stack: ffff801f901a4000 > >> [ 116.207020] PC is at smp_call_function_many+0x284/0x2e8 > >> [ 116.207023] LR is at smp_call_function_many+0x244/0x2e8 > >> [ 116.207026] pc : [] lr : [] > >> pstate: 80000145 > >> [ 116.207028] sp : ffff801f901a7be0 > >> [ 116.207030] x29: ffff801f901a7be0 x28: ffff000009139000 > >> [ 116.207036] x27: ffff000009139434 x26: 0000000000000080 > >> [ 116.207041] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff0000081565d0 > >> [ 116.207047] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: ffff000008e11e00 > >> [ 116.207052] x21: ffff801f6d5cff00 x20: ffff801f6d5cff08 > >> [ 116.207057] x19: ffff000009138e38 x18: 0000000000000a03 > >> [ 116.207063] x17: 0000ffffb77c9028 x16: ffff0000082e81d8 > >> [ 116.207068] x15: 00003d0d6dd44d08 x14: 0036312196549b4a > >> [ 116.207073] x13: 0000000058dabe4c x12: 0000000000000018 > >> [ 116.207079] x11: 00000000366e2f04 x10: 00000000000009f0 > >> [ 116.207084] x9 : ffff801f901a7d30 x8 : 0000000000000002 > >> [ 116.207089] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000 > >> [ 116.207095] x5 : ffffffff00000000 x4 : 0000000000000020 > >> [ 116.207100] x3 : 0000000000000020 x2 : 0000000000000000 > >> [ 116.207105] x1 : ffff801f6d682578 x0 : 0000000000000003 > >> > >> [ 150.443116] INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU > >> [ 150.448261] 25-...: (14997 ticks this GP) > >> idle=47a/140000000000001/0 softirq=349/349 fqs=7495 > >> [ 150.451115] INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: > >> [ 150.451123] 25-...: (14997 ticks this GP) > >> idle=47a/140000000000001/0 softirq=349/349 fqs=7495 > >> [ 150.451124] (detected by 13, t=15002 jiffies, g=805, c=804, q=8384) > >> [ 150.451136] Task dump for CPU 25: > >> [ 150.451138] kworker/25:1 R running task 0 454 2 0x00000002 > >> [ 150.451155] Workqueue: events netstamp_clear > >> [ 150.451158] Call trace: > >> [ 150.451164] [] __switch_to+0x90/0xa8 > >> [ 150.451172] [] static_key_slow_inc+0x128/0x138 > >> [ 150.451175] [] static_key_enable+0x34/0x60 > >> [ 150.451178] [] netstamp_clear+0x68/0x80 > >> [ 150.451181] [] process_one_work+0x158/0x478 > >> [ 150.451183] [] worker_thread+0x50/0x4a8 > >> [ 150.451187] [] kthread+0x108/0x138 > >> [ 150.451190] [] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50 > >> [ 150.477451] (t=15008 jiffies g=805 c=804 q=8384) > >> [ 150.482242] Task dump for CPU 25: > >> [ 150.482245] kworker/25:1 R running task 0 454 2 0x00000002 > >> [ 150.482259] Workqueue: events netstamp_clear > >> [ 150.482264] Call trace: > >> [ 150.482271] [] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x2b0 > >> [ 150.482277] [] show_stack+0x24/0x30 > >> [ 150.482281] [] sched_show_task+0x128/0x178 > >> [ 150.482285] [] dump_cpu_task+0x48/0x58 > >> [ 150.482288] [] rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xa0/0xe8 > >> [ 150.482297] [] rcu_check_callbacks+0x774/0x938 > >> [ 150.482305] [] update_process_times+0x34/0x60 > >> [ 150.482314] [] tick_sched_handle.isra.7+0x38/0x70 > >> [ 150.482319] [] tick_sched_timer+0x4c/0x98 > >> [ 150.482324] [] __hrtimer_run_queues+0xd8/0x2b8 > >> [ 150.482328] [] hrtimer_interrupt+0xa8/0x228 > >> [ 150.482334] [] arch_timer_handler_phys+0x3c/0x50 > >> [ 150.482341] [] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x8c/0x230 > >> [ 150.482344] [] generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50 > >> [ 150.482347] [] __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0 > >> [ 150.482351] [] gic_handle_irq+0xc4/0x170 > >> [ 150.482356] Exception stack(0xffff801f901a7ab0 to 0xffff801f901a7be0) > >> [ 150.482360] 7aa0: > >> 0000000000000003 ffff801f6d682578 > >> [ 150.482364] 7ac0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000020 > >> 0000000000000020 ffffffff00000000 > >> [ 150.482367] 7ae0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > >> 0000000000000002 ffff801f901a7d30 > >> [ 150.482371] 7b00: 00000000000009f0 00000000366e2f04 > >> 0000000000000018 0000000058dabe4c > >> [ 150.482375] 7b20: 0036312196549b4a 00003d0d6dd44d08 > >> ffff0000082e81d8 0000ffffb77c9028 > >> [ 150.482378] 7b40: 0000000000000a03 ffff000009138e38 > >> ffff801f6d5cff08 ffff801f6d5cff00 > >> [ 150.482382] 7b60: ffff000008e11e00 0000000000000001 > >> ffff0000081565d0 0000000000000000 > >> [ 150.482386] 7b80: 0000000000000080 ffff000009139434 > >> ffff000009139000 ffff801f901a7be0 > >> [ 150.482390] 7ba0: ffff000008156e8c ffff801f901a7be0 > >> ffff000008156ecc 0000000080000145 > >> [ 150.482394] 7bc0: ffff801f901a7be0 ffff000008156e68 > >> ffffffffffffffff ffff000008156e8c > >> [ 150.482397] [] el1_irq+0xb4/0x140 > >> [ 150.482401] [] smp_call_function_many+0x284/0x2e8 > >> [ 150.482405] [] kick_all_cpus_sync+0x30/0x38 > >> [ 150.482409] [] aarch64_insn_patch_text+0xec/0xf8 > >> [ 150.482415] [] arch_jump_label_transform+0x60/0x98 > >> [ 150.482420] [] __jump_label_update+0x8c/0xa8 > >> [ 150.482423] [] jump_label_update+0x58/0xe8 > >> [ 150.482429] [] static_key_slow_inc+0x128/0x138 > >> [ 150.482434] [] static_key_enable+0x34/0x60 > >> [ 150.482438] [] netstamp_clear+0x68/0x80 > >> [ 150.482441] [] process_one_work+0x158/0x478 > >> [ 150.482444] [] worker_thread+0x50/0x4a8 > >> [ 150.482448] [] kthread+0x108/0x138 > >> [ 150.482451] [] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50 > >> > >> ==================================== > >> > >> I am observing that this usually happens when the guest tries to > >> bringup or use the default virtio-net interface. > >> And I am unable to reproduce this when directly booting the guest > >> kernel without UEFI BIOS. > >> So anyone observed similar issue ? > >> > > > > I haven't seen this myself. > > > > Have you tried with other versions of QEMU and the host kernel by any > > chance using the same setup? > > The earlier qemu version (atleast 2.5 which is default on ubuntu > 16.04) have different issue. The same thing happens when I use > vhost=on but without vhost and with virtio-net didn't see the issue. > The Armband folks have also reported the vhost issue here > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+bug/1673564 So I just ran your setup using the flash emulation on the ThunderX in packet.net and my host is happily continuing to run hackbench. > > So I am beginning to think the issue could be related to the flash > emulation but wanted to check on ml if anyone else is seeing it. But > if it is flash emulation how can it hose the host like this ? Why do you think it's related to the flash emulation? >>From what you're telling me it sounds much more like a vhost regression. Can you try with v4.10 of the kernel with vhost=on ? Thanks, -Christoffer From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoffer Dall Subject: Re: host stalls when qemu-system-aarch64 with kvm and pflash Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 20:56:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20170329185630.GA4908@cbox> References: <20170328201623.GD20211@cbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE9840962 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:54:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qAHFLFFpN6cb for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:54:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-wr0-f175.google.com (mail-wr0-f175.google.com [209.85.128.175]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E98F4405DA for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:54:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l43so29097143wre.1 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu To: Radha Mohan Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:24:15PM -0700, Radha Mohan wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > Hi Radha, > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:58:24PM -0700, Radha Mohan wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I am seeing an issue with qemu-system-aarch64 when using pflash > >> (booting kernel via UEFI bios). > >> > >> Host kernel: 4.11.0-rc3-next-20170323 > >> Qemu version: v2.9.0-rc1 > >> > >> Command used: > >> ./aarch64-softmmu/qemu-system-aarch64 -cpu host -enable-kvm -M > >> virt,gic_version=3 -nographic -smp 1 -m 2048 -drive > >> if=none,id=hd0,file=/root/zesty-server-cloudimg-arm64.img,id=0 -device > >> virtio-blk-device,drive=hd0 -pflash /root/flash0.img -pflash > >> /root/flash1.img > >> > >> > >> As soon as the guest kernel boots the host starts to stall and prints > >> the below messages. And the system never recovers. I can neither > >> poweroff the guest nor the host. So I have resort to external power > >> reset of the host. > >> > >> ================== > >> [ 116.199077] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#25 stuck for 23s! > >> [kworker/25:1:454] > >> [ 116.206901] Modules linked in: binfmt_misc nls_iso8859_1 aes_ce_blk > >> shpchp crypto_simd gpio_keys cryptd aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce sha2_ce > >> sha1_ce uio_pdrv_genirq uio autofs4 btrfs raid10 rai > >> d456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor > >> raid6_pq libcrc32c raid1 raid0 multipath linear ast i2c_algo_bit ttm > >> drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_s > >> ys_fops drm nicvf ahci nicpf libahci thunder_bgx thunder_xcv > >> mdio_thunder mdio_cavium > >> > >> [ 116.206995] CPU: 25 PID: 454 Comm: kworker/25:1 Not tainted > >> 4.11.0-rc3-next-20170323 #1 > >> [ 116.206997] Hardware name: www.cavium.com crb-1s/crb-1s, BIOS 0.3 Feb 23 2017 > >> [ 116.207010] Workqueue: events netstamp_clear > >> [ 116.207015] task: ffff801f906b5400 task.stack: ffff801f901a4000 > >> [ 116.207020] PC is at smp_call_function_many+0x284/0x2e8 > >> [ 116.207023] LR is at smp_call_function_many+0x244/0x2e8 > >> [ 116.207026] pc : [] lr : [] > >> pstate: 80000145 > >> [ 116.207028] sp : ffff801f901a7be0 > >> [ 116.207030] x29: ffff801f901a7be0 x28: ffff000009139000 > >> [ 116.207036] x27: ffff000009139434 x26: 0000000000000080 > >> [ 116.207041] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff0000081565d0 > >> [ 116.207047] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: ffff000008e11e00 > >> [ 116.207052] x21: ffff801f6d5cff00 x20: ffff801f6d5cff08 > >> [ 116.207057] x19: ffff000009138e38 x18: 0000000000000a03 > >> [ 116.207063] x17: 0000ffffb77c9028 x16: ffff0000082e81d8 > >> [ 116.207068] x15: 00003d0d6dd44d08 x14: 0036312196549b4a > >> [ 116.207073] x13: 0000000058dabe4c x12: 0000000000000018 > >> [ 116.207079] x11: 00000000366e2f04 x10: 00000000000009f0 > >> [ 116.207084] x9 : ffff801f901a7d30 x8 : 0000000000000002 > >> [ 116.207089] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000 > >> [ 116.207095] x5 : ffffffff00000000 x4 : 0000000000000020 > >> [ 116.207100] x3 : 0000000000000020 x2 : 0000000000000000 > >> [ 116.207105] x1 : ffff801f6d682578 x0 : 0000000000000003 > >> > >> [ 150.443116] INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU > >> [ 150.448261] 25-...: (14997 ticks this GP) > >> idle=47a/140000000000001/0 softirq=349/349 fqs=7495 > >> [ 150.451115] INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: > >> [ 150.451123] 25-...: (14997 ticks this GP) > >> idle=47a/140000000000001/0 softirq=349/349 fqs=7495 > >> [ 150.451124] (detected by 13, t=15002 jiffies, g=805, c=804, q=8384) > >> [ 150.451136] Task dump for CPU 25: > >> [ 150.451138] kworker/25:1 R running task 0 454 2 0x00000002 > >> [ 150.451155] Workqueue: events netstamp_clear > >> [ 150.451158] Call trace: > >> [ 150.451164] [] __switch_to+0x90/0xa8 > >> [ 150.451172] [] static_key_slow_inc+0x128/0x138 > >> [ 150.451175] [] static_key_enable+0x34/0x60 > >> [ 150.451178] [] netstamp_clear+0x68/0x80 > >> [ 150.451181] [] process_one_work+0x158/0x478 > >> [ 150.451183] [] worker_thread+0x50/0x4a8 > >> [ 150.451187] [] kthread+0x108/0x138 > >> [ 150.451190] [] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50 > >> [ 150.477451] (t=15008 jiffies g=805 c=804 q=8384) > >> [ 150.482242] Task dump for CPU 25: > >> [ 150.482245] kworker/25:1 R running task 0 454 2 0x00000002 > >> [ 150.482259] Workqueue: events netstamp_clear > >> [ 150.482264] Call trace: > >> [ 150.482271] [] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x2b0 > >> [ 150.482277] [] show_stack+0x24/0x30 > >> [ 150.482281] [] sched_show_task+0x128/0x178 > >> [ 150.482285] [] dump_cpu_task+0x48/0x58 > >> [ 150.482288] [] rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xa0/0xe8 > >> [ 150.482297] [] rcu_check_callbacks+0x774/0x938 > >> [ 150.482305] [] update_process_times+0x34/0x60 > >> [ 150.482314] [] tick_sched_handle.isra.7+0x38/0x70 > >> [ 150.482319] [] tick_sched_timer+0x4c/0x98 > >> [ 150.482324] [] __hrtimer_run_queues+0xd8/0x2b8 > >> [ 150.482328] [] hrtimer_interrupt+0xa8/0x228 > >> [ 150.482334] [] arch_timer_handler_phys+0x3c/0x50 > >> [ 150.482341] [] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x8c/0x230 > >> [ 150.482344] [] generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50 > >> [ 150.482347] [] __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0 > >> [ 150.482351] [] gic_handle_irq+0xc4/0x170 > >> [ 150.482356] Exception stack(0xffff801f901a7ab0 to 0xffff801f901a7be0) > >> [ 150.482360] 7aa0: > >> 0000000000000003 ffff801f6d682578 > >> [ 150.482364] 7ac0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000020 > >> 0000000000000020 ffffffff00000000 > >> [ 150.482367] 7ae0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > >> 0000000000000002 ffff801f901a7d30 > >> [ 150.482371] 7b00: 00000000000009f0 00000000366e2f04 > >> 0000000000000018 0000000058dabe4c > >> [ 150.482375] 7b20: 0036312196549b4a 00003d0d6dd44d08 > >> ffff0000082e81d8 0000ffffb77c9028 > >> [ 150.482378] 7b40: 0000000000000a03 ffff000009138e38 > >> ffff801f6d5cff08 ffff801f6d5cff00 > >> [ 150.482382] 7b60: ffff000008e11e00 0000000000000001 > >> ffff0000081565d0 0000000000000000 > >> [ 150.482386] 7b80: 0000000000000080 ffff000009139434 > >> ffff000009139000 ffff801f901a7be0 > >> [ 150.482390] 7ba0: ffff000008156e8c ffff801f901a7be0 > >> ffff000008156ecc 0000000080000145 > >> [ 150.482394] 7bc0: ffff801f901a7be0 ffff000008156e68 > >> ffffffffffffffff ffff000008156e8c > >> [ 150.482397] [] el1_irq+0xb4/0x140 > >> [ 150.482401] [] smp_call_function_many+0x284/0x2e8 > >> [ 150.482405] [] kick_all_cpus_sync+0x30/0x38 > >> [ 150.482409] [] aarch64_insn_patch_text+0xec/0xf8 > >> [ 150.482415] [] arch_jump_label_transform+0x60/0x98 > >> [ 150.482420] [] __jump_label_update+0x8c/0xa8 > >> [ 150.482423] [] jump_label_update+0x58/0xe8 > >> [ 150.482429] [] static_key_slow_inc+0x128/0x138 > >> [ 150.482434] [] static_key_enable+0x34/0x60 > >> [ 150.482438] [] netstamp_clear+0x68/0x80 > >> [ 150.482441] [] process_one_work+0x158/0x478 > >> [ 150.482444] [] worker_thread+0x50/0x4a8 > >> [ 150.482448] [] kthread+0x108/0x138 > >> [ 150.482451] [] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50 > >> > >> ==================================== > >> > >> I am observing that this usually happens when the guest tries to > >> bringup or use the default virtio-net interface. > >> And I am unable to reproduce this when directly booting the guest > >> kernel without UEFI BIOS. > >> So anyone observed similar issue ? > >> > > > > I haven't seen this myself. > > > > Have you tried with other versions of QEMU and the host kernel by any > > chance using the same setup? > > The earlier qemu version (atleast 2.5 which is default on ubuntu > 16.04) have different issue. The same thing happens when I use > vhost=on but without vhost and with virtio-net didn't see the issue. > The Armband folks have also reported the vhost issue here > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+bug/1673564 So I just ran your setup using the flash emulation on the ThunderX in packet.net and my host is happily continuing to run hackbench. > > So I am beginning to think the issue could be related to the flash > emulation but wanted to check on ml if anyone else is seeing it. But > if it is flash emulation how can it hose the host like this ? Why do you think it's related to the flash emulation? >>From what you're telling me it sounds much more like a vhost regression. Can you try with v4.10 of the kernel with vhost=on ? Thanks, -Christoffer