From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] devtools: add autotest app to build script Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:33:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20170330153322.GB14552@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20170329140419.27149-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20170329163856.10932-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20170329163856.10932-5-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <1851186.Q5rVaVkRzi@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C016D2B92 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:33:26 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1851186.Q5rVaVkRzi@xps13> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 04:36:11PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2017-03-29 17:38, Bruce Richardson: > > Since the test app is no longer being build by default as part of a build, > > we need to update the testbuild script to take account of this. > [...] > > --- a/devtools/test-build.sh > > +++ b/devtools/test-build.sh > > @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ for conf in $configs ; do > > echo "================== Build $dir" > > make -j$J EXTRA_CFLAGS="$maxerr $DPDK_DEP_CFLAGS" \ > > EXTRA_LDFLAGS="$DPDK_DEP_LDFLAGS" $verbose O=$dir > > + echo "================== Build tests for $dir" > > + make test-build -j$J EXTRA_CFLAGS="$maxerr $DPDK_DEP_CFLAGS" \ > > + EXTRA_LDFLAGS="$DPDK_DEP_LDFLAGS" $verbose O=$dir > > ! $short || break > > echo "================== Build examples for $dir" > > export RTE_SDK=$(pwd) > > It should be added after the "short break". > You have no idea how many times in preparing the patchset I moved the addition above the break, and then back below it, and above it again! You pick what you think is best. :-) > The test-build target rebuild all. It rebuilds the libs, but not the apps, which is why we can't just use test-build target, or we will skip testpmd. > I think it should be standard apps like the examples > and not re-link the libs before building. > The other way is to merge it with the above command (default build). I tried merging the two into a single command, i.e. "make all test-build" but that failed with parallel builds because the two jobs try and build some things at the same time and interfere with each other. [The kernel drivers seemed to be the main problem] /Bruce