From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933338AbdCaNyw (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:54:52 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:21042 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933159AbdCaNyu (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:54:50 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,252,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="242446531" Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 06:54:48 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree Message-ID: <20170331135448.GE4543@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20170331164451.519d1d7e@canb.auug.org.au> <20170331064228.2u6x3s4yp6xolsbw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170331064228.2u6x3s4yp6xolsbw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Argh! > > Andrew, please drop that patch. And the x86 out-of-line of __atomic_add_unless(). Why dropping the second? Do you have something better? On the first there were no 0day regressions, so at least basic performance checking has been done. -Andi