[PATCH 06/35] fsnotify: Update comments

[Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>]

Add a comment that lifetime of a notification mark is protected by SRCU
and remove a comment about clearing of marks attached to the inode. It
is stale and more uptodate version is at fsnotify_destroy_marks() which
is the function handling this case.

Reviewed-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
 fs/notify/mark.c | 13 +------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/notify/mark.c b/fs/notify/mark.c
index 6043306e8e21..44836e539169 100644
--- a/fs/notify/mark.c
+++ b/fs/notify/mark.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
  *
  * LIFETIME:
  * Inode marks survive between when they are added to an inode and when their
- * refcnt==0.
+ * refcnt==0. Marks are also protected by fsnotify_mark_srcu.
  *
  * The inode mark can be cleared for a number of different reasons including:
  * - The inode is unlinked for the last time.  (fsnotify_inode_remove)
@@ -61,17 +61,6 @@
  * - The fsnotify_group associated with the mark is going away and all such marks
  *   need to be cleaned up. (fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group)
  *
- * Worst case we are given an inode and need to clean up all the marks on that
- * inode.  We take i_lock and walk the i_fsnotify_marks safely.  For each
- * mark on the list we take a reference (so the mark can't disappear under us).
- * We remove that mark form the inode's list of marks and we add this mark to a
- * private list anchored on the stack using i_free_list; we walk i_free_list
- * and before we destroy the mark we make sure that we dont race with a
- * concurrent destroy_group by getting a ref to the marks group and taking the
- * groups mutex.
-
- * Very similarly for freeing by group, except we use free_g_list.
- *
  * This has the very interesting property of being able to run concurrently with
  * any (or all) other directions.
  */
-- 
2.10.2