From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752234AbdDCT6N (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:58:13 -0400 Received: from tartarus.angband.pl ([89.206.35.136]:37522 "EHLO tartarus.angband.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751590AbdDCT6M (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:58:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 21:57:56 +0200 From: Adam Borowski To: Andi Kleen Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Nicolas Pitre , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] minitty: a minimal TTY layer alternative for embedded systems Message-ID: <20170403195756.xitzpei2knmwt3sx@angband.pl> References: <20170401222119.25106-1-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <87pogur0y9.fsf@firstfloor.org> <20170403153103.GB22592@two.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20170403153103.GB22592@two.firstfloor.org> X-Junkbait: aaron@angband.pl, zzyx@angband.pl User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kilobyte@angband.pl X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on tartarus.angband.pl); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:31:03AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > Except for that (and possibly VT) it is unlikely that people really > rely on the obsolete terminal features from the 70ies. So it's a kind > of cleanup. But... but... but what shall we do without OLCUC?!? I guess sending these features to the pasture would be nice even in mainstream TTY. Probably even without a Kconfig option to restore them. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Meow! ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Collisions shmolisions, let's see them find a collision or second ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ preimage for double rot13! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kilobyte@angband.pl (Adam Borowski) Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 21:57:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] minitty: a minimal TTY layer alternative for embedded systems In-Reply-To: <20170403153103.GB22592@two.firstfloor.org> References: <20170401222119.25106-1-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <87pogur0y9.fsf@firstfloor.org> <20170403153103.GB22592@two.firstfloor.org> Message-ID: <20170403195756.xitzpei2knmwt3sx@angband.pl> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:31:03AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > Except for that (and possibly VT) it is unlikely that people really > rely on the obsolete terminal features from the 70ies. So it's a kind > of cleanup. But... but... but what shall we do without OLCUC?!? I guess sending these features to the pasture would be nice even in mainstream TTY. Probably even without a Kconfig option to restore them. -- ??????? Meow! ??????? ??????? Collisions shmolisions, let's see them find a collision or second ??????? preimage for double rot13!