From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: git@jeffhostetler.com, Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] fsck: force core.checksumindex=1
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 04:27:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170404082743.jqdn27j6bbftvtvq@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACBZZX50+Mpj-GY11KNmh+BkNkWCX3OZjHFQ3iK8c8Hib90_Xg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 10:23:52AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> The part that confused my & I found unintuitive is that there's a new
> core.WHATEVER config that'll get silently overridden by a specific
> command, git-fsck.
>
> Nothing else I can think of in core.* works like this, i.e. it's a
> namespace for "applies to all of git", core.editor, core.ignoreCase
> etc.
>
> Having git-fsck have a command-line option that's on by default as I
> suggested is one way to get out of that confusion. It makes it a
> special case of a CLI option overriding some config.
Yeah, I do agree your suggestion makes it slightly less confusing.
I mostly just think we can avoid the situation altogether, which IMHO is
preferable.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-04 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-03 18:53 [PATCH v4 0/4] read-cache: call verify_hdr() in a background thread git
2017-04-03 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] read-cache: core.checksumindex git
2017-04-03 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] fsck: force core.checksumindex=1 git
2017-04-03 20:31 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-04-04 2:29 ` Jeff King
2017-04-04 8:23 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2017-04-04 8:27 ` Jeff King [this message]
2017-04-04 13:13 ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-04-04 20:18 ` Jeff King
2017-04-03 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] t1450-fsck: test core.checksumindex git
2017-04-03 18:53 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] p0002-read-cache: " git
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170404082743.jqdn27j6bbftvtvq@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@jeffhostetler.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jeffhost@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.