From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 1/6] IB/IPoIB: Introduce RDMA netdev interface and IPoIB structs Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 13:37:30 -0600 Message-ID: <20170404193730.GA10780@obsidianresearch.com> References: <20170404191732.31895-1-leon@kernel.org> <20170404191732.31895-2-leon@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170404191732.31895-2-leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Doug Ledford , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Niranjana Vishwanathapura , Alex Vesker , Erez Shitrit List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 10:17:27PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > struct ib_device { > + /* Do not access @dma_device directly from ULP nor from HW drivers. */ > + struct device *dma_device; > + Why is this hunk in this patch? I thought Bart was taking care of this topic? Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html