Le Tue, 4 Apr 2017 12:45:07 -0500 Eric Sandeen écrivait: > > > > I don't see why or where we'd use filestreams there... What's the > > use case actually? > > well, it's in your crash backtrace, so you tell me ;) > I remember now... There writing files in long sequences, so that's what the filestream option is for. It worked fine for a few months though... > >>> > >>> The machine goes on crashing on disk access... xfs_repair 4.9 is > >>> running now, and after that we'll reboot with a current kernel > >>> (4.4.59). Any advice? > >> > >> Yep, go back in time & get an xfs_metadump before you repair > >> it. :( > > > > You know how it goes it crashes, users scream, administrator jumps > > on xfs_repair, and the rest is history. > > > >> Please do at least capture repair output. > >> > > > > Well the only thing I know is "there was nothing special in > > xfs_repair output"... I'll tell the admin to catch the output next > > time if necessary... > > So it crashed on every access, and repair fixed it, but repair said > "nothing special" in the process? :( > It crashes, it reboots without complaining, so there aren't any grave obvious upfront problems at least... Well we'll see if it crashes again with a 4.4.59... Just in case we removed the filestreams option in the fstab. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique | | +33 1 78 94 84 02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------