From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932944AbdDETqc (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:46:32 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:33846 "EHLO mail-lf0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754804AbdDETqX (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2017 15:46:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 21:46:19 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBLxJlwaWXFhA==?= To: Darren Hart Cc: Jonathan Woithe , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] fujitsu-laptop: call_fext_func() cleanup Message-ID: <20170405194619.GA892@kmp-mobile.hq.kempniu.pl> References: <20170405065023.3267-1-kernel@kempniu.pl> <20170405152902.GB27833@fury> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20170405152902.GB27833@fury> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 08:50:20AM +0200, Michał Kępień wrote: > > This series contains a few cleanups for the call_fext_func() function. > > Just as a reminder, please note that v1 of this series is currently > > applied in testing. > > > > Changes from v1: > > > > - Update debug message logged by call_fext_func() to reflect code flow > > changes introduced by patch 2/3. > > My apologies Michał, I misunderstood - I was thinking you had a second change to > the 11 patch series, so I asked for a v2. > > This series is already in for-next, and we only rebase that for bugs that would > be bad to leave in the history - like things that break bisecting. > > For this change, would you please send just 1 new patch on top of for-next? > > Again, I'm sorry that, my fault. No worries. I will send the debug message update as a separate patch on top of for-next tomorrow. -- Best regards, Michał Kępień