All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the right mapping_gfp_mask for final shmem allocation
@ 2017-04-05 22:15 Chris Wilson
  2017-04-05 22:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
  2017-04-06 11:55 ` [PATCH] " Joonas Lahtinen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-04-05 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Daniel Vetter

Many sightings report the greater prevalence of allocation failures.
This is all due to the incorrect use of mapping_gfp_constraint(), so
remove it in favour of just querying the mapping_gfp_mask() which are
the exact gfp_t we wanted in the first place.

We still do expect a higher chance of reporting ENOMEM, as that is the
intention of using __GFP_NORETRY -- to fail rather than oom after having
reclaimed from our bo caches, and having done a direct|kswapd reclaim
pass.

Reported-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100594
Fixes: 24f8e00a8a2e ("drm/i915: Prefer to report ENOMEM rather than incur the oom for gfx allocations")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 5f911a25e99a..57f51f1dac69 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2314,7 +2314,7 @@ i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 			 * defer the oom here by reporting the ENOMEM back
 			 * to userspace.
 			 */
-			reclaim = mapping_gfp_constraint(mapping, 0);
+			reclaim = mapping_gfp_mask(mapping);
 			reclaim |= __GFP_NORETRY; /* reclaim, but no oom */
 
 			page = shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp(mapping, i, reclaim);
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Use the right mapping_gfp_mask for final shmem allocation
  2017-04-05 22:15 [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the right mapping_gfp_mask for final shmem allocation Chris Wilson
@ 2017-04-05 22:34 ` Patchwork
  2017-04-06 11:55 ` [PATCH] " Joonas Lahtinen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-04-05 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Use the right mapping_gfp_mask for final shmem allocation
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/22554/
State : success

== Summary ==

Series 22554v1 drm/i915: Use the right mapping_gfp_mask for final shmem allocation
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/22554/revisions/1/mbox/

fi-bdw-5557u     total:278  pass:267  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:11  time: 427s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm    total:278  pass:256  dwarn:8   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:14  time: 423s
fi-bsw-n3050     total:278  pass:242  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:36  time: 569s
fi-bxt-j4205     total:278  pass:259  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:19  time: 506s
fi-bxt-t5700     total:278  pass:258  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:20  time: 552s
fi-byt-j1900     total:278  pass:254  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:24  time: 488s
fi-byt-n2820     total:278  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time: 479s
fi-hsw-4770      total:278  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:16  time: 412s
fi-hsw-4770r     total:278  pass:262  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:16  time: 417s
fi-ilk-650       total:278  pass:228  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:50  time: 423s
fi-ivb-3520m     total:278  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18  time: 478s
fi-ivb-3770      total:278  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18  time: 471s
fi-kbl-7500u     total:278  pass:260  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18  time: 455s
fi-kbl-7560u     total:278  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:10  time: 566s
fi-skl-6260u     total:278  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:10  time: 461s
fi-skl-6700hq    total:278  pass:261  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:17  time: 573s
fi-skl-6700k     total:278  pass:256  dwarn:4   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:18  time: 458s
fi-skl-6770hq    total:278  pass:268  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:10  time: 491s
fi-skl-gvtdvm    total:278  pass:265  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:13  time: 437s
fi-snb-2520m     total:278  pass:250  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:28  time: 532s
fi-snb-2600      total:278  pass:249  dwarn:0   dfail:0   fail:0   skip:29  time: 400s

39a0f48c8bc7c528cc705016dafa08a9dedfd36b drm-tip: 2017y-04m-05d-13h-22m-47s UTC integration manifest
2648b12 drm/i915: Use the right mapping_gfp_mask for final shmem allocation

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_4416/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the right mapping_gfp_mask for final shmem allocation
  2017-04-05 22:15 [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the right mapping_gfp_mask for final shmem allocation Chris Wilson
  2017-04-05 22:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-04-06 11:55 ` Joonas Lahtinen
  2017-04-06 12:10   ` Chris Wilson
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-04-06 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx; +Cc: Daniel Vetter

On ke, 2017-04-05 at 23:15 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Many sightings report the greater prevalence of allocation failures.
> This is all due to the incorrect use of mapping_gfp_constraint(), so
> remove it in favour of just querying the mapping_gfp_mask() which are
> the exact gfp_t we wanted in the first place.
> 
> We still do expect a higher chance of reporting ENOMEM, as that is the
> intention of using __GFP_NORETRY -- to fail rather than oom after having
> reclaimed from our bo caches, and having done a direct|kswapd reclaim
> pass.
> 
> Reported-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@intel.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100594
> Fixes: 24f8e00a8a2e ("drm/i915: Prefer to report ENOMEM rather than incur the oom for gfx allocations")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the right mapping_gfp_mask for final shmem allocation
  2017-04-06 11:55 ` [PATCH] " Joonas Lahtinen
@ 2017-04-06 12:10   ` Chris Wilson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-04-06 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joonas Lahtinen; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx

On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 02:55:16PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ke, 2017-04-05 at 23:15 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Many sightings report the greater prevalence of allocation failures.
> > This is all due to the incorrect use of mapping_gfp_constraint(), so
> > remove it in favour of just querying the mapping_gfp_mask() which are
> > the exact gfp_t we wanted in the first place.
> > 
> > We still do expect a higher chance of reporting ENOMEM, as that is the
> > intention of using __GFP_NORETRY -- to fail rather than oom after having
> > reclaimed from our bo caches, and having done a direct|kswapd reclaim
> > pass.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason.ekstrand@intel.com>
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100594
> > Fixes: 24f8e00a8a2e ("drm/i915: Prefer to report ENOMEM rather than incur the oom for gfx allocations")
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Pushed in shame,
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-06 12:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-05 22:15 [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the right mapping_gfp_mask for final shmem allocation Chris Wilson
2017-04-05 22:34 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-04-06 11:55 ` [PATCH] " Joonas Lahtinen
2017-04-06 12:10   ` Chris Wilson

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.