On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 02:53:57PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 14:40 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Again, this appears to have only data and minor code style changes
> > relative to the existing arizona driver - is there no opportunity for
> > code sharing here?

> I'll have a look at how it would work out.
> My thought was that these two regulator drivers are so small it wasn't
> worth creating an entanglement between arizona and madera for so little
> code.

It's a fairly small amount of code but it's an extremely high proportion
of the code in the driver and doing something a bit unusual, not just
boilerplate.