From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cw9Jo-0002iy-NB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:27:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cw9Jl-0005Gk-Jm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:27:28 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cw9Jl-0005FY-EX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:27:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 23:27:10 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20170406152710.GE3981@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <1491462524-1617-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <20170406145841-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170406145841-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 0/9] VT-d: vfio enablement and misc enhances List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, tianyu.lan@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, Marcel Apfelbaum , jan.kiszka@siemens.com, jasowang@redhat.com, David Gibson , alex.williamson@redhat.com, bd.aviv@gmail.com On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 03:00:28PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 03:08:35PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: > > This is v8 of vt-d vfio enablement series. > > > > v8 > > - remove patches 1-9 since merged already > > - add David's r-b for all the patches > > - add Aviv's s-o-b in the last patch > > - rename iommu to iommu_dmar [Jason] > > - rename last patch subject to "remote IOTLB" [Jason] > > - pick up jason's two patches to fix vhost breakage > > - let vhost leverage the new IOMMU notifier interface > > Looks good to me except I'm still wondering why there's a single patch > by Jason. Answered in the other thread (the other one has been picked up already). > Marcel - you mentioned that you intend to try to open and > maintain pci-next. Would you like to pick this one up? Otherwise, pls > repost after 2.10. Thanks, -- peterx