All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@openadk.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] arp-scan: new package
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 20:03:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170408180349.GR5361@waldemar-brodkorb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170405183445.6cde0af8@free-electrons.com>

Hi Thomas,
Thomas Petazzoni wrote,

> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:14:10 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle
> (Essensium/Mind) wrote:
> > On the br-arm-cortex-m4-full toolchain, the build fails with a
> > segmentation fault in elf2flt, so add an exception for ARM FLAT
> > toolchains. Other FLAT toolchains (e.g. br-m68k-5208-full) work fine.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
> > ---
> > I tried to debug the elf2flt segfault but elf2flt isn't exactly the
> > most low-entry-bar source code...
> 
> I think we have a regression here, which I would point to the bump of
> binutils from 2.26 to 2.27. Indeed, several packages are now causing
> segfaults in elf2flt on ARM:
> 
> Busybox:
> 
>   http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/475/4758354f0e2f7f127c1a99ef7846eb62f5ce41b5/build-end.log
> 
> pcre:
> 
>   http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/68c/68cf951594b0e67b45f8711745c17b93e2fbc03e/build-end.log
> 
> and I'm sure the list will grow. So I believe that binutils 2.27
> produces binaries that are a bit different, and confuse elf2flt.
> 
> Looking at https://github.com/uclinux-dev/elf2flt/commits/master, I
> don't see anything that particular stands out.

It seems this is somehow fixed with binutils 2.28. But I have no
idea in which commit(s). Should we blacklist binutils 2.27 for ARM
noMMU?

best regards
 Waldemar

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-08 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-05 10:14 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] arp-scan: new package Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-05 16:34 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-04-06  8:26   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-06  8:33     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-04-06  8:42       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-06  9:55         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-04-08 18:03   ` Waldemar Brodkorb [this message]
2017-04-10  8:06     ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-05 21:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170408180349.GR5361@waldemar-brodkorb.de \
    --to=wbx@openadk.org \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.