From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuanhan Liu Subject: next technical board meeting, 2017-04-10 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:49:33 +0800 Message-ID: <20170410064933.GX18844@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <20170330094058.nh2nhk4ko6tsqedn@localhost.localdomain> <20170406100142.GA10609@jerin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jerin Jacob To: dev@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170406100142.GA10609@jerin> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi all, The last techboard meeting was canceled, and it's been rescheduled to today, 10th Apr, at 3pm UTC. I should have sent it out a bit earlier. Sorry! The agenda remains the same (see below). --yliu On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 03:31:43PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: > -----Original Message----- > > Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:11:07 +0530 > > From: Jerin Jacob > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: techboard@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] next technical board meeting, 2017-04-06 > > User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0) > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > A meeting of the DPDK technical board will occur next Thursday, > > April 6th 2017 at 9am UTC? > > > > The meeting takes place on the #dpdk-board channel on IRC. > > This meeting is public, so anybody can join, see below for the agenda. > > > > Jerin > > The meeting got canceled due to lack of quorum. > (6 out of 9 members were present, which is less than 70%(minimum quorum)) > # http://dpdk.org/about/techboard#meetings > > Yuanhan Liu volunteered to chair the next meeting. > No particular date was agreed for next meeting. > > Yuanhan to follow on mail to select a date/time of next meeting. > > > > > 1) Divergence between DPDK/Linux PF/VF implementations. > > > > Discussions: > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/060529.html > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-March/060063.html > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-December/053056.html > > > > 2) Representative for the DPDK governance board > > > > 3) Scope of cmdline and cfgfile libraries in DPDK. > > Discuss the scope of cmdline and cfgfile libraries in DPDK > > and see if we allow more libs like that (Keith proposed a CLI lib), > > or we do not do more, > > or do we target to replace them by better external equivalents? > > > > 4) Community questions/issues > > > > > >