From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753043AbdDJIne (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2017 04:43:34 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:49644 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752803AbdDJInb (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2017 04:43:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:43:20 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Darren Hart Cc: Peter Zijlstra , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, juri.lelli@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, xlpang@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jdesfossez@efficios.com, bristot@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 13/13] futex: futex_lock_pi() vs PREEMPT_RT_FULL Message-ID: <20170410084319.wne5dayple555yft@linutronix.de> References: <20170322103547.756091212@infradead.org> <20170322104152.161341537@infradead.org> <20170408022610.GC16143@fury> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170408022610.GC16143@fury> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2017-04-07 19:26:10 [-0700], Darren Hart wrote: > I would like to see more testing because... well... futexes. But, we don't have > a futex torture suite yet, but that is something I'm hoping to be looking into > in the near future. What testing we do have available has passed between my > futex selftests, the LTP suite, the pi_stress, and the RT runs by Sebastian. It is also part of the latest v4.9-rt release which exposes it to greater audience. > Thanks, Sebastian