From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57573)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1cxVMC-0007yQ-Qe
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:11:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1cxVMB-0007Ee-Ky
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 05:11:32 -0400
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:11:17 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20170410091117.GD4883@noname.redhat.com>
References: <20170407065414.9143-1-famz@redhat.com>
	<20170407065414.9143-5-famz@redhat.com>
	<20170407125051.GB16146@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
	<20170408034351.GC6548@lemon>
	<20170410080621.GB4883@noname.redhat.com>
	<20170410084551.GD14050@lemon>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170410084551.GD14050@lemon>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/6] block: Quiesce old aio context
 during bdrv_set_aio_context
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

Am 10.04.2017 um 10:45 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> On Mon, 04/10 10:06, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 08.04.2017 um 05:43 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > > On Fri, 04/07 13:50, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:54:12PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > > @@ -4413,6 +4416,10 @@ void bdrv_set_aio_context(BlockDriverState *bs, AioContext *new_context)
> > > > >      aio_context_acquire(new_context);
> > > > >      bdrv_attach_aio_context(bs, new_context);
> > > > >      aio_context_release(new_context);
> > > > > +    if (bs->job) {
> > > > > +        block_job_resume(bs->job);
> > > > > +    }
> > > > 
> > > > Should this be called before aio_context_release(new_context)?
> > > 
> > > Yes, and I'm going to replace it with bdrv_parent_drained_begin() as Kevin
> > > suggested.
> > 
> > I think at the moment bdrv_parent_drained_begin() can't replace it yet,
> > but you need both.
> 
> I think we have it already, see 600ac6a0e (blockjob: add devops to blockjob
> backends):
> 
>     bdrv_parent_drained_begin
>      -> blk_root_drained_begin
>       -> block_job_drained_begin
>        -> block_job_pause

Ah, yes, you're right. Somehow I thought this was only for 2.10.

Kevin