From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Haworth <dave@fen-net.de>
Subject: Re: IMX6 ESDHC mmc with UHS-I occasional failure with DDR50 cards
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:40:00 +0200
Message-ID: <20170411144000.GA3541@fen-net.de>
References: <CAJ+vNU2S5NubFzKkHKjS2iHPt2_ysC-2e87ghUXPxsVEOKX+4w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170404220040.GA2997@fen-net.de>
 <CAJ+vNU16hUhLufteFx2nqxnh1mrf6B025EqtpmWZp6USgfiJzw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from hermes.f3n.de ([212.204.115.44]:49289 "EHLO hermes.f3n.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751047AbdDKOkA (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:40:00 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+vNU16hUhLufteFx2nqxnh1mrf6B025EqtpmWZp6USgfiJzw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
To: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
Cc: Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, Weijun Yang <york.yang@csr.com>

Hi Tim,

On 2017-04-07 12:55:28 -0700, Tim Harvey wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the response, but I don't think this is the same thing
> because in your case I don't see any tuning or transfer errors
> reported.

I think the "shifted response code" might be the result of a transfer
error, but you're right - no tuning.

I see you had another reply though - I hope you manage to find a solution.

Cheers,
Dave