From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxxG9-00046Q-Vs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:59:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cxxG9-0002bX-9P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 10:59:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:58:49 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20170411145849.GO4516@noname.str.redhat.com> References: <20170411145050.31290-1-mreitz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170411145050.31290-1-mreitz@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.9?] block/io: Comment out permission assertions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laurent Vivier , Stefan Hajnoczi , Fam Zheng Am 11.04.2017 um 16:50 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > In case of block migration, there may be writes to BlockBackends that do > not have the write permission taken. Before this issue is fixed (which > is not going to happen in 2.9), we therefore cannot assert that this is > the case. > > Suggested-by: Kevin Wolf > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz I tested block migration (migrate -b). Leaving postcopy migration, which is apparently also broken, to Laurent. Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf Tested-by: Kevin Wolf