From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753050AbdDLRQZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:16:25 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33878 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752089AbdDLRQY (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:16:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:16:22 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Sergey Temerkhanov , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: please use pci_alloc_irq_vectors in thunderx_edac. Message-ID: <20170412171622.GA8639@lst.de> References: <20170412060559.GA20471@lst.de> <20170412092101.cg63lwzwl44arukk@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170412092101.cg63lwzwl44arukk@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:21:01AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Do we need to mark pci_enable_msix_exact() deprecated or so, or maybe a > checkpatch rule? Did we ever do this for deprecated APIs before? For now I'm just watching Linux-next and sending gentle reminders :)