All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Allow only one remove lun work item to be issued per lun
@ 2017-04-15 13:43 Cathy Avery
  2017-04-15 14:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Cathy Avery @ 2017-04-15 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kys, jejb, martin.petersen
  Cc: sthemmin, haiyangz, devel, linux-kernel, linux-scsi

When running multipath on a VM if all available paths go down
the driver can schedule large amounts of storvsc_remove_lun
work items to the same lun. In response to the failing paths
typically storvsc responds by taking host->scan_mutex and issuing
a TUR per lun. If there has been heavy IO to the failed device
all the failed IOs are returned from the host. A remove lun work
item is issued per failed IO. If the outstanding TURs have not been
completed in a timely manner the scan_mutex is never released or
released too late. Consequently the many remove lun work items are
not completed as scsi_remove_device also tries to take host->scan_mutex.
This results in dragging the VM down and sometimes completely.

This patch only allows one remove lun to be issued to a particular
lun while it is an instantiated member of the scsi stack.

Signed-off-by: Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
index 016639d..9dbb5bf 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
@@ -478,6 +478,10 @@ struct storvsc_device {
 	u64 port_name;
 };
 
+struct storvsc_dev_hostdata {
+	atomic_t req_remove_lun;
+};
+
 struct hv_host_device {
 	struct hv_device *dev;
 	unsigned int port;
@@ -918,6 +922,8 @@ static void storvsc_handle_error(struct vmscsi_request *vm_srb,
 				u8 asc, u8 ascq)
 {
 	struct storvsc_scan_work *wrk;
+	struct storvsc_dev_hostdata *hostdata;
+	struct scsi_device *sdev;
 	void (*process_err_fn)(struct work_struct *work);
 	bool do_work = false;
 
@@ -953,8 +959,17 @@ static void storvsc_handle_error(struct vmscsi_request *vm_srb,
 		}
 		break;
 	case SRB_STATUS_INVALID_LUN:
-		do_work = true;
-		process_err_fn = storvsc_remove_lun;
+		sdev = scsi_device_lookup(host, 0, vm_srb->target_id,
+					  vm_srb->lun);
+		if (sdev) {
+			hostdata = sdev->hostdata;
+			if (hostdata &&
+			    !atomic_cmpxchg(&hostdata->req_remove_lun, 0, 1)) {
+				do_work = true;
+				process_err_fn = storvsc_remove_lun;
+			}
+			scsi_device_put(sdev);
+		}
 		break;
 	case SRB_STATUS_ABORTED:
 		if (vm_srb->srb_status & SRB_STATUS_AUTOSENSE_VALID &&
@@ -1426,9 +1441,22 @@ static int storvsc_device_configure(struct scsi_device *sdevice)
 			sdevice->no_write_same = 0;
 	}
 
+	sdevice->hostdata = kzalloc(sizeof(struct storvsc_dev_hostdata),
+				    GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (!sdevice->hostdata)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void storvsc_device_destroy(struct scsi_device *sdevice)
+{
+	if (sdevice->hostdata) {
+		kfree(sdevice->hostdata);
+		sdevice->hostdata = NULL;
+	}
+}
+
 static int storvsc_get_chs(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct block_device * bdev,
 			   sector_t capacity, int *info)
 {
@@ -1669,6 +1697,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template scsi_driver = {
 	.eh_timed_out =		storvsc_eh_timed_out,
 	.slave_alloc =		storvsc_device_alloc,
 	.slave_configure =	storvsc_device_configure,
+	.slave_destroy =	storvsc_device_destroy,
 	.cmd_per_lun =		255,
 	.this_id =		-1,
 	.use_clustering =	ENABLE_CLUSTERING,
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Allow only one remove lun work item to be issued per lun
  2017-04-15 13:43 [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Allow only one remove lun work item to be issued per lun Cathy Avery
@ 2017-04-15 14:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2017-04-15 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cathy Avery
  Cc: kys, jejb, martin.petersen, sthemmin, haiyangz, devel,
	linux-kernel, linux-scsi

Just add a singlethreaded workqueue for storvsc_handle_error and you'll
get serialization for all error handling for free.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Allow only one remove lun work item to be issued per lun
@ 2017-04-15 14:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2017-04-15 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cathy Avery
  Cc: sthemmin, linux-scsi, martin.petersen, haiyangz, linux-kernel,
	devel, jejb

Just add a singlethreaded workqueue for storvsc_handle_error and you'll
get serialization for all error handling for free.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Allow only one remove lun work item to be issued per lun
  2017-04-15 14:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2017-04-17 19:44     ` Cathy Avery
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Cathy Avery @ 2017-04-17 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: kys, jejb, martin.petersen, sthemmin, haiyangz, devel,
	linux-kernel, linux-scsi

On 04/15/2017 10:06 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Just add a singlethreaded workqueue for storvsc_handle_error and you'll
> get serialization for all error handling for free.

The problem I am seeing is that many work items can be queued up for the 
same lun before it goes away. The single threaded queue would have to allow
for only a queue of one and no more. Either that or each work item for a 
particular lun must have the same memory address so it gets
rejected if it you try to queue a remove to the same lun twice.

Maybe I am not understanding your suggestion correctly.

Thanks,

Cathy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Allow only one remove lun work item to be issued per lun
@ 2017-04-17 19:44     ` Cathy Avery
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Cathy Avery @ 2017-04-17 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig
  Cc: sthemmin, linux-scsi, martin.petersen, haiyangz, linux-kernel,
	devel, jejb

On 04/15/2017 10:06 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Just add a singlethreaded workqueue for storvsc_handle_error and you'll
> get serialization for all error handling for free.

The problem I am seeing is that many work items can be queued up for the 
same lun before it goes away. The single threaded queue would have to allow
for only a queue of one and no more. Either that or each work item for a 
particular lun must have the same memory address so it gets
rejected if it you try to queue a remove to the same lun twice.

Maybe I am not understanding your suggestion correctly.

Thanks,

Cathy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Allow only one remove lun work item to be issued per lun
@ 2017-10-17 17:32 Cathy Avery
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Cathy Avery @ 2017-10-17 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kys, hch, haiyangz, jejb, martin.petersen, dan.carpenter
  Cc: devel, linux-kernel, linux-scsi

When running multipath on a VM if all available paths go down
the driver can schedule large amounts of storvsc_remove_lun
work items to the same lun. In response to the failing paths
typically storvsc responds by taking host->scan_mutex and issuing
a TUR per lun. If there has been heavy IO to the failed device
all the failed IOs are returned from the host. A remove lun work
item is issued per failed IO. If the outstanding TURs have not been
completed in a timely manner the scan_mutex is never released or
released too late. Consequently the many remove lun work items are
not completed as scsi_remove_device also tries to take host->scan_mutex.
This results in dragging the VM down and sometimes completely.

This patch only allows one remove lun to be issued to a particular
lun while it is an instantiated member of the scsi stack.

Changes since v1:

Use single threaded workqueue to serialize work in
storvsc_handle_error [Christoph Hellwig]

Signed-off-by: Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
index 5e7200f..6febcdb 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
@@ -486,6 +486,8 @@ struct hv_host_device {
 	unsigned int port;
 	unsigned char path;
 	unsigned char target;
+	struct workqueue_struct *handle_error_wq;
+	char work_q_name[20];
 };
 
 struct storvsc_scan_work {
@@ -922,6 +924,7 @@ static void storvsc_handle_error(struct vmscsi_request *vm_srb,
 {
 	struct storvsc_scan_work *wrk;
 	void (*process_err_fn)(struct work_struct *work);
+	struct hv_host_device *host_dev = shost_priv(host);
 	bool do_work = false;
 
 	switch (SRB_STATUS(vm_srb->srb_status)) {
@@ -988,7 +991,7 @@ static void storvsc_handle_error(struct vmscsi_request *vm_srb,
 	wrk->lun = vm_srb->lun;
 	wrk->tgt_id = vm_srb->target_id;
 	INIT_WORK(&wrk->work, process_err_fn);
-	schedule_work(&wrk->work);
+	queue_work(host_dev->handle_error_wq, &wrk->work);
 }
 
 
@@ -1803,10 +1806,19 @@ static int storvsc_probe(struct hv_device *device,
 	if (stor_device->num_sc != 0)
 		host->nr_hw_queues = stor_device->num_sc + 1;
 
+	/*
+	 * Set the error handler work queue.
+	 */
+	snprintf(host_dev->work_q_name, sizeof(host_dev->work_q_name),
+		 "storvsc_error_wq_%d", host->host_no);
+	host_dev->handle_error_wq =
+			create_singlethread_workqueue(host_dev->work_q_name);
+	if (!host_dev->handle_error_wq)
+		goto err_out2;
 	/* Register the HBA and start the scsi bus scan */
 	ret = scsi_add_host(host, &device->device);
 	if (ret != 0)
-		goto err_out2;
+		goto err_out3;
 
 	if (!dev_is_ide) {
 		scsi_scan_host(host);
@@ -1815,7 +1827,7 @@ static int storvsc_probe(struct hv_device *device,
 			 device->dev_instance.b[4]);
 		ret = scsi_add_device(host, 0, target, 0);
 		if (ret)
-			goto err_out3;
+			goto err_out4;
 	}
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCSI_FC_ATTRS)
 	if (host->transportt == fc_transport_template) {
@@ -1827,14 +1839,17 @@ static int storvsc_probe(struct hv_device *device,
 		fc_host_port_name(host) = stor_device->port_name;
 		stor_device->rport = fc_remote_port_add(host, 0, &ids);
 		if (!stor_device->rport)
-			goto err_out3;
+			goto err_out4;
 	}
 #endif
 	return 0;
 
-err_out3:
+err_out4:
 	scsi_remove_host(host);
 
+err_out3:
+	destroy_workqueue(host_dev->handle_error_wq);
+
 err_out2:
 	/*
 	 * Once we have connected with the host, we would need to
@@ -1858,6 +1873,7 @@ static int storvsc_remove(struct hv_device *dev)
 {
 	struct storvsc_device *stor_device = hv_get_drvdata(dev);
 	struct Scsi_Host *host = stor_device->host;
+	struct hv_host_device *host_dev = shost_priv(host);
 
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCSI_FC_ATTRS)
 	if (host->transportt == fc_transport_template) {
@@ -1865,6 +1881,7 @@ static int storvsc_remove(struct hv_device *dev)
 		fc_remove_host(host);
 	}
 #endif
+	destroy_workqueue(host_dev->handle_error_wq);
 	scsi_remove_host(host);
 	storvsc_dev_remove(dev);
 	scsi_host_put(host);
-- 
2.5.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-17 17:32 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-15 13:43 [PATCH] scsi: storvsc: Allow only one remove lun work item to be issued per lun Cathy Avery
2017-04-15 14:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-15 14:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-17 19:44   ` Cathy Avery
2017-04-17 19:44     ` Cathy Avery
2017-10-17 17:32 Cathy Avery

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.